• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Female Dragonborn - No longer have breasts?


log in or register to remove this ad


DandD said:
Seriously, I mean, the very first example of a Half-Dragon in the 3rd edition Monster Manual was that of an Half-Red Dragon/Half-Troll... If you're so horny that you would even bang a troll, it just proves that dragons would also do it with ants, non-sentient rocks, plants, goblins, humans, elves, dwarves, horses, fish and beholders.
They're literally sex-obsessed geezers.
I sure hope that 4th edition dragons tons down the horny procreation-aspect that all dragons in 3rd edition suffer. If anything at all, other dragons should show contempt for dragons who do it with non-dragons, the same as we humans look down upon people who do it with goats or dogs.
Yuck, disgusting.
Dragons are strange.. Maybe it is because they get so old and are still physically fit? Other Dragons get boring after a few centuries.
Hey, some turtle species seem to have trouble procreating - rarely meet each other, and then they don't really know what to do with each other. Dragons just go the other way. ;)
The Dragon equivalent of the Kama-Sutra must be very... strange. Probably as large as the Dragon Prophecies of Eberron.

Rule 34: If you can think of it there's porn of it on the net.

Rule 35: If there, in fact, no porn of it then there soon will be.
Who would have thought that AT-ATs could be so sexy disgusting.
 

UndeadScottsman said:
Not to say the current status of Halflings is better or worse than the old, but there's a difference between what makes sense scientifically and what makes sense in general when constructing a fantasy world. Scientific inaccuracies can only bother those who know the specific laws and theorem's that are being broken; general concepts like "guy the size of a small child having near the strength of someone nearly twice his size" is a lot easier for the average person to see as inconsistant as it's not scaling, even though it's actually scientifically possible (seriously, chimps, while smaller than humans, are crazy strong)
So humans can't be as strong or stronger than giants, because that wouldn't make any sense to your average person, okay. Since ogres (in 3e) have a STR of 18, within human norms before even taking level adjustments into account, humans should be, I dunno, 9 feet tall in D&D land? Of course that puts the halflings back to being as strong as someone twice their size, so we'll have to bump them up further to 6 feet tall...
 



What I thought polls showed conclusively that boobs are very well thought of.

WOTC return to drawing busty hominoid creatures THE POWER OF BOOBS COMMANDS IT
 

Sheesh guys. If you want to get hung up on science consider this.

A species is commonly defined by the ability to breed and produce fertile offspring. By that token elves, orcs and humans are all a common species. For that matter everything is apparently a species of dragon. Changelings are the same species as any humanoid they can shift into.

Honestly stuff like this is all too possible in D&D.
[sblock=possibly not safe for work]
family_gathering_colored.jpg
[/sblock]
 


Andor said:
A species is commonly defined by the ability to breed and produce fertile offspring. By that token elves, orcs and humans are all a common species. For that matter everything is apparently a species of dragon. Changelings are the same species as any humanoid they can shift into.
While D&D takes things to extremes even D&D doesn't get as strange as mythology in that respect. Also even in the realm of RL science there is significant debate as to just how the line should be drawn for species. There are quite a few animals that are considered to be in different species that can produce fertile hybrid offspring.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top