Ferrous Dragons

[metaldragon0]

I thought you guys converted the Ferrous Dragons to 3.5 a while ago. Whatever happened to that?

 

[Mortis]

If they're the conversions I'm thinking about then they were for an article for Dragon magazine and IIRC the threads were removed when the article was submitted.

Shade or BOZ should be able to clarify that.

Regards
Mortis

 

[Shade]

That is correct. Stay tuned!

 

[BOZ]

yep. if they decide to print it, you'll know when they appear in the "next issue" box. kind of like with our soon-too-redebut good archomentals.

 

[Mortis]

Well the obvious issue would be Dragon 356, fingers crossed.

Regards
Mortis

 

[RavinRay]

But the Inzeladun site is still hosted here, right? The only 3.0 unstatted ferrous dragon is the tungsten. What will happen to that if Dragon publishes official 3.5e stats for all five?

 

[BOZ]

absolutely nothing?

 

[Aspect of BOZ]

Well the obvious issue would be Dragon 356, fingers crossed.

good guess?

 

[RavinRay]

I'll have to wait about 3 weeks for 365 to appear at my FLGS to find out why they're called "metallic" dragons on the cover and if it means they're all good (alignment-wise). So, the metallic-chromatic score reads:

Metallics: 12 (brass, bronze, copper, gold, silver, mercury, steel, chromium, cobalt, iron, nickel, tungsten).
Chromatics: 9 (black, blue, green, red, white, brown, orange, purple, yellow).

Metallics win for now.

 

[Shade]

Unless they did major modifications to what we turned in, they won't be metallics.