ST, I wasn't going to respond to this, since I don't want to put you into the middle. But you did include me in the above statement.
I was just hoping you could clarify for me what I was doing that you object to. If you could show me where I have twisted his words, or attacked his character, or ignored his points, or any 'bad faith' debating, I will apologize. I have been trying to address his points, and use his premises as much as possible. My only error, that I see, is that a wiser man would have walked away from this conversation, since he seems dead set against actually discussing/debating any of his own points. (Or at least anything that might be against what he is saying.)
