Mistwell
Crusty Old Meatwad
dmccoy1693 said:I liked alot of what you said, but I find the above to be... Not in total agreement. Bureacracies are notably inefficient as everything must be regularly checked and doubled checked and the checkers must be checked and the then there are random checks to keep the checker's checkers on their toes. There are reports the checkers have to file and statistics someone else has to come up with from the reports. Then the boss has to have a meeting to improve effiency. And all that is accomplished at that meeting is another meeting is scheduled where they will come up with a rough draft for the adjenda of the series of meetings that will improve effiency.
And to pay for all those checkers and meetings, you need taxes to go up. When taxes go up, wages have to go up to compensate. And when wages go up, so do prices.
I agree. More bureacracy /= low taxes and high efficiency. But then, I don't think lawful neutral has to mean more bureacracy (it does in my Santa Monica example, but does not in the Irvine example).