Game

What Game?

  • Conan the Roleplaying Game

    Votes: 4 50.0%
  • CyberNet

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Inzeladun (RuneQuest rules - classless)

    Votes: 3 37.5%
  • Inzeladun (Grim Tales rules)

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Inzeladun (Iron Heroes rules)

    Votes: 3 37.5%
  • Inzeladun (D&D rules)

    Votes: 4 50.0%
  • Oriental Adventures (technically Inzeladun, but in the Orient)

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • A new Psion only game (Expanded Psionics Handbook)

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • Weird Wild West (OGL Wild West, Call of Cthulhu, and Grim Tales)

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Call of Cthulhu

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Science Fiction

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Superheroes

    Votes: 5 62.5%

  • Poll closed .
InzeladunMaster said:
That's funny! True, but funny. We are silly people, aren't we?

I wouldn't say that it was true or funny. I think your take on it is flawed by your own admission of silliness. Even though I would not call it silly. If you had any courage at all, you would call a spade a spade and say that it is instead truthful and comical and that we are in fact absurd people. Call it what you want, but I think you know the truth in your heart.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Grimhelm said:
I wouldn't say that it was true or funny. I think your take on it is flawed by your own admission of silliness. Even though I would not call it silly. If you had any courage at all, you would call a spade a spade and say that it is instead truthful and comical and that we are in fact absurd people. Call it what you want, but I think you know the truth in your heart.

That's a bunch of bologna! I checked, and I have blood in my heart, not truth! (This is probably why objective truth never much matters to me, preferring subjective truths far more - I just don't have truth in my heart, just blood.)

Even so! We are not absurd so much as silly. I think the usage of silly definitely applies to us. Absurd indicates a maturity that I certainly do not have, and silly indicates a child-like attitude that is endearing.
 


InzeladunMaster said:
By what criteria would I choose them? Based on attendence? That would give me Jason and John, but what about Chris, who really wants to see Inzeladun again? What about Dave, whose attendence is just slightly worse than Jason's?

Hmm. That means that of me, Jason and Dave, I have the better attendance?!? I find that SO hard to believe but I'll take it. I RULE!!!
 

Grimhelm said:
I think this discussion has taken a decidedly Semantic turn, and I am a rabid anti-Semantic.

You would be. You have never appreciated Semantics like I have. Nor can you beat a dead horse as well as I.
 
Last edited:

thormagni said:
Hmm. That means that of me, Jason and Dave, I have the better attendance?!? I find that SO hard to believe but I'll take it. I RULE!!!

Lest you forget, I put everything into a spreadsheet...

One day I hope to be appointed Big Brother by the government. :)
 

I think you are both loonies and I will be glad to vote for neither of you. I say we just show up at Vince's house when he is gone and play Parcheesi.
 

Grimhelm said:
I think you are both loonies and I will be glad to vote for neither of you. I say we just show up at Vince's house when he is gone and play Parcheesi.

And can I say, for the record, how happy I would be if we could get Bob, Craig, Allen and Chris playing with the group again regularly. And Mark involved at all?

Has anyone spoken to Allen recently? Is he even in town?
 

Sounds like I've missed alot of disscussion lately. I'll probably be a little quiet until I catch up on things, But I am still here!
 


Remove ads

Top