Happy Haggert Hurried Hungry Hitch Hiking Hired Henchmen Hivers.... apply within
- Thread starter megamania
- Start date
Scott DeWar
Prof. Emeritus-Supernatural Events/Countermeasure
It started on the west coast and slowly made its way across. since it was a pbs show, its funding was low and slow.
You'll have to Internet louder, I didn't hear that!
That kid is clearly marriage material. He's already broken.
Random Bystander
First Post
One for the price of two is equivalent to two for the price of one.
Proof:
2x = x + x
1x = x
x = $y
2x = $y
$2y != x
$y = 2x
C&C welcome.
Proof:
2x = x + x
1x = x
x = $y
2x = $y
$2y != x
$y = 2x
C&C welcome.
Scott DeWar
Prof. Emeritus-Supernatural Events/Countermeasure
Shouldn't this be :
One for the price of two is equivalent to two for the price of one.
Proof:
2x = x + x
1x = x
x = $y
2x =2 $y <- because if x=$y, then double the x, then double the $y. Right?
$2y != x
$y = 2x
C&C welcome.
Random Bystander
First Post
Ok, so for semi-formal logic - If the price of one is equal to the price of two; the price of one being fundamentally one-half the price of two; then the only way to reconcile those two differing statements is if the price of one, and the price of two, is the same; through the use of a "sale price".
There is one flaw in the logic that I can see, but I shall leave that as an exercise for the reader, and it is not so much a flaw as a second solution.
Or, possibly, an infinite number of solutions.
Similar Threads
