Forked from: Grading At-Will Powers
Is this correct?
Hawk’s Talon has a +4 (Wis Mod) )attack bonus (+6 if the target has cover or concealment) (+8 if the target has cover and concealment) and an average damage of 18.
Spikes of the Manticore has two attacks. The first with an average damage of 18 and the second with an average damage of 12.5 for a final average of 15.25
Assuming you hit 50% of the time, gaining a second attack increases your odds of hitting by 25% which is equivalent to a +5 attack bonus.
If the target has no cover or concealment, Hawks Talon would provide -1 attack and +2.75 damage compared to Spikes of the Manticore.
So, according to Torchlyte's chart...
Hawk's Talon is better than Spikes of the Manticore even when the target doesn't have cover or concealment?
Torchlyte said:Statistically, the attack vs damage point is always at 10...
When your average damage > 10; +1 attack > +1 damage
When your average damage > 10; +2 attack > +2 damage
...and so forth.
When your average damage > 11; +2 attack > (+1 atk, +1 dam)
Is this correct?
Hawk’s Talon has a +4 (Wis Mod) )attack bonus (+6 if the target has cover or concealment) (+8 if the target has cover and concealment) and an average damage of 18.
Spikes of the Manticore has two attacks. The first with an average damage of 18 and the second with an average damage of 12.5 for a final average of 15.25
Assuming you hit 50% of the time, gaining a second attack increases your odds of hitting by 25% which is equivalent to a +5 attack bonus.
If the target has no cover or concealment, Hawks Talon would provide -1 attack and +2.75 damage compared to Spikes of the Manticore.
So, according to Torchlyte's chart...
Hawk's Talon is better than Spikes of the Manticore even when the target doesn't have cover or concealment?