Healing Word

So, in Hypersmurf's example, you are using the Nimble Attack power at all points during that, as you are still using the 'Use a Power' action. However, if said power includes shifts and such, those shifts and such -explicitly- deny the interruption via opportunity actions during those shifts.

Let's say we have a power that lets me make a ranged attack, move two squares, and make another ranged attack. (I'm sure there probably is one, but I can't be bothered hunting for it right now :) )

And let's say I'm within the threatening reach of a Boneclaw, with its Relentless Opportunist ability allowing it to make multiple OAs in a single turn.

The first attack provokes, and leaving the first square provokes, and leaving the second square provokes, and the second ranged attack provokes, right?

Now let's say the power swaps the move for a 2-square shift.

The first attack provokes, and leaving the first square doesn't provoke, and leaving the second square doesn't provoke, and the second ranged attack provokes, right?

So even though shifts don't provoke OAs, I still provoked OAs with ranged attacks as part of that power.

Now, in the Nimble Attack example, I use a ranged power in a square adjacent to an enemy, and I shift out of that square, and I make a ranged attack. The shift does not provoke. But using a ranged power in a square adjacent to an enemy does. And if I'm threatened by the time I make the ranged attack, making a ranged attack does as well.

Even though the shift doesn't provoke, that doesn't change the other ways in which Nimble Attack provokes OAs. And one of the ways Nimble Attack can provoke an OA, since it's a ranged power, is if it is used in a square adjacent to an enemy.

-Hyp.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


The first attack provokes, and leaving the first square provokes, and leaving the second square provokes, and the second ranged attack provokes, right?
One error in your math, Hypersmurf: By your reasoning, the monster should actually get five attacks, not four. One for using the ranged power within its reach, then others for making the attacks and moving. Similarly, by this argument a ranged basic attack provokes two OAs from this monster.
 

One error in your math, Hypersmurf: By your reasoning, the monster should actually get five attacks, not four. One for using the ranged power within its reach, then others for making the attacks and moving. Similarly, by this argument a ranged basic attack provokes two OAs from this monster.
activating a power that uses ranged attacks doesn't provoke. the attack themselves are what provkes
 

Good clarification, Hyp, and good point.

Good clarification, yes, but good point? Maybe :)

activating a power that uses ranged attacks doesn't provoke. the attack themselves are what provkes

Actually, that is exactly what Hypersmurf is disputing. He claims (and is supported at least in part by RAW) that activating a ranged power provokes OAs, even if the actions taken during that power do not. Hence, activating Nimble Strike when adjacent to an enemy provokes an OA, even though the first action you take is to shift out of range...
 

Good clarification, yes, but good point? Maybe :)



Actually, that is exactly what Hypersmurf is disputing. He claims (and is supported at least in part by RAW) that activating a ranged power provokes OAs, even if the actions taken during that power do not. Hence, activating Nimble Strike when adjacent to an enemy provokes an OA, even though the first action you take is to shift out of range...
OPPORTUNITY ACTION
✦ Trigger: Opportunity actions allow you to take an
action in response to an enemy letting its guard
down. The one type of opportunity action that every
combatant can take is an opportunity attack (page
290). Opportunity attacks are triggered by an enemy
leaving a square adjacent to you or by an adjacent
enemy making a ranged attack or an area attack.
so straight from the book
activating a power that uses ranged attacks doesn't provoke. the attack themselves are what provokes
 

He [Hypersmurf] claims (and is supported at least in part by RAW) that activating a ranged power provokes OAs, even if the actions taken during that power do not. Hence, activating Nimble Strike when adjacent to an enemy provokes an OA, even though the first action you take is to shift out of range...

Which would make all scoot n' shoot powers pointless.

A clear case of RAI vs. RAW to me.
 

so straight from the book
activating a power that uses ranged attacks doesn't provoke. the attack themselves are what provokes

You're quoting PHB p268, but that's not the only relevant page.

PHB p271:
Provoke Opportunity Attacks: If you use a ranged power while adjacent to an enemy, that enemy can make an opportunity attack against you.

PHB p271:
Provoke Opportunity Attacks: If you use an area power while adjacent to an enemy, that enemy can make an opportunity attack against you.

PHB p290 (the page referenced in the paragraph you quoted!):
Ranged and Area Powers Provoke: If an enemy adjacent to you uses a ranged power or an area power, you can make an opportunity attack against that enemy.

So from p268, we know that ranged attacks provoke, and from pp271 and 290, we also know that using a ranged power provokes.


NMcCoy said:
One error in your math, Hypersmurf: By your reasoning, the monster should actually get five attacks, not four. One for using the ranged power within its reach, then others for making the attacks and moving. Similarly, by this argument a ranged basic attack provokes two OAs from this monster.

Right - not so much an error as easing into that part :) If you open with that argument, it's more likely to be dismissed out of hand than if you come back to it!

Now, given that very few monsters can make more than one OA per turn, the RBA provoking twice comes up far less often than Nimble Attack provoking before the shift might.

-Hyp.
 



Remove ads

Top