Help with a spell name (Slightly humorous)

[Dakkareth]

Rather than making plants especially vulnerable to it, I'd make it constructs, alternatively maybe oozes.

And wouldn't creatures with the fire subtype also get penalities? After all dousing their flames with lots of water can't be healthy to them ...

-Dakkareth

 

[William Ronald]

Dakarreth,

A good idea on the oozes and on fire elementals. Unfortunately, constructs are not living creatures, so I might have to modify the spell description. Most constructs seem to be immune to most spells like this. (Flesh to stone can set a stone golem back but I do not know what effect this would logically have on a golem.)

Thanks for the advice.