A player of my group always complain about being too unbelievable that a medium fighter can kill a colossal dragon, that it is the same as a GIJoe killing you with a needle.
Well I always say it's a game of fantasy, and reality is not an important issue, etc etc.
Then he came up with a house rule for that. I thought maybe It could work, but did not adopted it in my game yet. The rule is the following:
A lethal weapon deals lethal damage to a creature at least two sizes bigger, same with non-lethal weapons. After that, lethal weapons deal non-lethal damage, and non-lethal weapons deal no damage at all. So a medium longsword deals only non-lethal damage to a Purple Worm and a great red wyrm, but deals lethal damage to any huge, large, medium, small .... creatures.
What's your opinion on that crazy rule?
Do you know any house rule out there that covers that issue?
Thanks.
Well I always say it's a game of fantasy, and reality is not an important issue, etc etc.
Then he came up with a house rule for that. I thought maybe It could work, but did not adopted it in my game yet. The rule is the following:
A lethal weapon deals lethal damage to a creature at least two sizes bigger, same with non-lethal weapons. After that, lethal weapons deal non-lethal damage, and non-lethal weapons deal no damage at all. So a medium longsword deals only non-lethal damage to a Purple Worm and a great red wyrm, but deals lethal damage to any huge, large, medium, small .... creatures.
What's your opinion on that crazy rule?
Do you know any house rule out there that covers that issue?
Thanks.