Nail said:
Isn't there RAW guidance somewhere on how "height" of a creature interacts with Space?
Not to my recollection. But, then again, I'm getting old.
Nail said:
I could see an explanation for option #1. After all "reach" is as much a combat abstraction as "space", and insisting on adding an abstract number to a actual (height) number..........
Obviously, I go with #2. If the creature's height is specified, it should probably be used. The creature's length and/or width is not as important (e.g. a purple worm fits within a 20x20 Space despite being 80ft long) but even in some cases, that doesn't make sense (a roc, no matter how you slice it, fills up way more squares than its Space -- can you say 80ft wingspan?). So, there are problems with Space in d20.
However, if you use Space for height, you might get cases where a creature cannot even attack in a 'square' (I call 'em voxels) below its actual Height. The purple worm is one arguable example (if you accept that a snake-like creature can extend half its height up), but a clearer example is the
Elder Fire Elemental. It as a height of 40ft, but a Space of 15 and a Reach of 15. Per your rule #1, it could only Reach 30ft high, 10ft below the top of the creature. So, you could fly through (or near) the top of the creature and it could not even attack you! IMO, this is strong evidence to use Rule #2.