This is a Legit ruling.
Takes all sorts. Doubt I'd want to play with a GM who banned all cross-sex PCs. Banning a particular player, OTOH, might be fine.
This is a Legit ruling.
Takes all sorts. Doubt I'd want to play with a GM who banned all cross-sex PCs. Banning a particular player, OTOH, might be fine.
It's served me well for years. I've never lacked for players.
Yeah, I find it icky but I'm sure many are fine with it.
For decades I have had a house rule that you can only play your own gender. I'm not going to watch a huge bearded ex-Ranger with tattooed knuckles roleplay a halfling girl ever again.
My players are too damn colorful as it.
You are (obviously) under no obligation to answer, but I'm curious: Was the problem in how the player/s handled other-gender characters, or was it the incongruity/cognitive dissonance between the player/s you saw and the character/s you imagined? Obviously the table-rule works for your table--and since I'm not at your table I'm completely unaffected by it--and I have no quarrel with it.
It was both.
I tend to have players who are veterans (whether male or female), and the banter at the table is laden with politically incorrect invective, to say the least. It is not an environment conducive to certain types of roleplay.
I answered as a player, a role I seldom get. And that is "Rarely."I guess this is necessary to say today- please don't make this political. I apologize in advance if I used any incorrect verbiage (gender/sex/etc.).
The poll is from 1-5. 1 is always play different gender(s) from yourself; 5 is never play different gender(s) from yourself. The others are in between.
In our latest campaign (before the coronavirus put it on hold) one of my groups had a situation where EVERYONE was playing a cross-gender PC. The one female player was running a male PC. The four male players were running female PCs. We did not plan that but it just happened.