I wonder if it could be abused for more than just a "different way to multiclass". For example, I think something similar to racial classes could be added, for what 3E had as "High LA" races. Basically, you don't get the full features of your class for getting more racial features, to play something exotic, like a Mind Flayer or even a fully fledged Dragon.
I wonder if it could be abused for more than just a "different way to multiclass". For example, I think something similar to racial classes could be added, for what 3E had as "High LA" races. Basically, you don't get the full features of your class for getting more racial features, to play something exotic, like a Mind Flayer or even a fully fledged Dragon.
I wonder if it could be abused for more than just a "different way to multiclass".
I could have used quotes. "Abused" in the sense "that's now what it was intended for".Abused or used?
I don't think it is an interesting option for 'abuse' (in the sense of 'how can I create the most uber character possible), but I think it is a hugely interesting option for creating interesting class concepts.
I agree that it could provide a really interesting basis for providing 'monster classes', so that you are half primary class and half 'monster class'.
Cheers
I could have used quotes. "Abused" in the sense "that's now what it was intended for".
Like the new bard build in Arcane Power? I don't think it would require a lot of multiclassing to get there.has anyone taken a run at trying to make an arcane archer? I've thought about it, but never really sat down to do it.