Everyone in my group hates playing healers BUT one guy. He always loved being a 3.5/Pathfinder Cleric.
He always did tend to be a melee cleric though. He loves to wade into combat and dish out the hurt by hand and use his spells for buffing before a fight and healing mostly afterwards.
When it came to 5E he was excited about the War Cleric but quickly lost his excitement. He has since asked me to look into finding a way for him to gain a extra attack every round even if it means giving up his War Cleric feature of extra attacks for wisdom bonus ect..
Now I could just remove that feature and give him a extra attack at 6th level and call it a day"and still might if I cant find something within the rules" but I/we would like to find something legal.
Anyone have any ideas? Maybe Paladin 5/ cleric 15 ? Is there a better way?
When it came to 5E he was excited about the War Cleric but quickly lost his excitement. He has since asked me to look into finding a way for him to gain a extra attack every round even if it means giving up his War Cleric feature of extra attacks for wisdom bonus ect..
I would start analyzing this from another angle, but since I would probably arrive at what you just decided yourself, I'll be briefI need to get home to see what the spellcasting part of a 5 Paladin/15 cleric would be. I think that is going to be what i suggest.
I think he likes to melee and probably at first would rather have been a fighter but the group needed a healer so he tried cleric but tried to get his fighter (High) while playing a cleric. He knows he isn't ever going to be as good a melee guy as the fighter....Fighters get tons more attacks and specials BUT he seems to be happy being a melee oriented cleric. He would happily give up greater spell damage for increased melee damage.
Why does he want the extra attack so much? I think his Pathfinder and 3.5 clerics got two attacks and he just considers that the baseline for melee class's. Like I said I could tell him right now..you get a extra melee attack at 5th but lose all attack spells and he would be thrilled.
Come to think of it i only remember him casting ranged attack spells in pathfinder once.
So it isn't a power grab for more damage or anything like that. It just fits his mental image of what a Battle Cleric should be.
You know I think I just talked myself into giving him a extra attack at 6th level. House Rule #23 coming up. No reason to have him go Paladin and all that hassle for a tiny bit more combat ability...I'll just take his war feature for it and call it a day and see how it ends up.
You know I think I just talked myself into giving him a extra attack at 6th level. House Rule #23 coming up. No reason to have him go Paladin and all that hassle for a tiny bit more combat ability...I'll just take his war feature for it and call it a day and see how it ends up.
This, along with spirit guardians and plate mail and shield, and I'm having a blast tanking as a war cleric.
Yeah, this. I was a tempest cleric, not war, but same premise. waded into battle wearing plate armor with spirit guardians up, and use spiritual weapon (doesn't require concentration) for a bonus attack if you want. One of the players in my group, a guy who considers himself a bit of an optimizer, said he was jealous and was gonna play a cleric next time lol (he was playing a fighter/warlock)

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.