If there was one thing about 3rdE that you could change, what would it be?

To those who are commenting about 3E vs. 1E or 2E...my opinion, from someone who has played from all editions...

frankly, most people 3E over the other two because, in comparison, 1E and 2E sucks. There are a few people who like 1E and 2E, and that's fine, but if you want to compare the systems of the 3 editions, the first two just suck system wise, and play wise also. I won't give detailed reasons as to why because that would be a very very long post, but someone had to say the truth about the first two editions in comparison to this 3rd edition that we have.
 

log in or register to remove this ad







Well, I suppose the thread has hit the point of diminishing returns....

But,

If I could just change one thing, it would be this:

I would take 3E back OUT of the dungeon.

In other words, I would have, from the beginning, designed 3E around the idea of city/world/all-inclusive campaigning, rather than balancing the spells, classes, feats, etc., around the idea of dungeon adventures, as it says they did in the DMG.

I think doing that would cure a lot of the so called "balance" issues that people come across, in terms of things like Teleport or Polymorph.

That's my one thing.

Not the only thing, mind you.

But it is just ONE thing.

Can't deny that.


Patrick Y.

PS: Ren and Stimpy
 



Remove ads

Top