R_J_K75
Legend
Confirmed by who? Stop talking in absolutes and stop telling me I'm wrongNo, it's confirmed
Confirmed by who? Stop talking in absolutes and stop telling me I'm wrongNo, it's confirmed
The Lawful Good could see it being a just punishment for certain individuals (not all individuals, but an appropriate punishment for certain crimes/individuals), or might be running an underground railroad to get the slaves freed or might be heading up the opposition to have the system banished (if they're the old testament sort, they might even be a bit annoyed that the individual is "getting off easy"). More than likely though, they wouldn't be someone to stand by the wayside, they'd be actively doing something about it one way or another. Also the big difference with the Chaotic Good and the Neutral Good would be likely would be they have a higher purpose, they have a plan and they have a code or stance about how they would be acting. Both the Chaotic Good and the Neutral Good would be outraged they're slaves and be jumping at the chance to just bust whomever they could free loose as soon as they could. The Lawful Good likely be working towards a plan that would affect all the slaves and change the mindset of the slavers as well.I would think the Lawful Good would be working "within the system" to eliminate the practice. Given that "the system" is overtly evil, though, I think most Lawful Good folks would be trying to eliminate it, one way or another.
(Trying to create a democracy in Hell that would work for the benefit of all seems optimistic, even for the most optimistic of Lawful Good folks, like Carrot from Discworld.)
You ARE factually wrong.Confirmed by who? Stop talking in absolutes and stop telling me I'm wrong
You have moved toward evil. You are now a devil dealing with second hand souls. Welcome to EVIL side. We STeAL chocOlate ChIP cookies.I am playing a hell-focused high level campaign and most of the party is Good aligned (mostly Lawful Good in fact).
I am a Lawful Neutral character and I am the one using soul coins the most (essentially the treasurer). While using soul coins does have an immoral feel to it, I don't know that it is out of character for such an alignment. I mean the souls are dammed either because they were bad people or because they made a deal with a Devil. From a Lawful Neutral point of view isn't this what they deserve?
Thoughts?
Kant argue with that.Violates Kant’s categorical imperative, quite literally treating people as a means to an end (the coin) rather than an end in themselves. Absolutely evil.
I mean they lore suggests that when used in an infernal machine the soul is destroyed. By this logic using a soul coin might be seen as a neutral or even good act from a pragmatic POV. A good or neutral soul doesn't deserve eternal torment and releasing an evil soul likely means it just ends up as a manes or lemure,or the exalted of some evil deity.Hmm. Yes, dealing in soul coins is distasteful and likely evil. But that brings up the question: is the construction of an afterlife where evil souls are condemned to eternal* torture not then inherently evil? I mean, is being forged into a coin any worse than what's already happening to them in Hell?
* For certain values of eternal.
MTF pg. 165 says:No, it's confirmed Devils will happily take other souls.
Hellfire weapons and Hellfire Engines send the souls of those they slay to Hell to be made into Lemures.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.