Last book had quivering palm, for instance. That's a level 17 or 18 ability, I forget which. So, yeah. Epic level stuff.They are all supposed to be around 10-15 level. I haven't seen them use any "epic level" powers.
Last book had quivering palm, for instance. That's a level 17 or 18 ability, I forget which. So, yeah. Epic level stuff.They are all supposed to be around 10-15 level. I haven't seen them use any "epic level" powers.
Last book had quivering palm, for instance. That's a level 17 or 18 ability, I forget which. So, yeah. Epic level stuff.
She's cast Create Undead as a level 3 cleric spell in the Companion books. Healing spells, the Summon Mount spell... and that's just off the top of my head.There's been vague references to her being able to channel the power of her god but it's awfully vague if she's a cleric at all.
WHY was it put on as a blouse? How difficult was it to make it something actually practical other than "Hey, lets put her in something girlish?" Nothing more than tired justification for the same old tropes. If we had a male character getting that same robe, would it have been turned into a shirt, or something else? My money is on the "something else."That's why she wanted the robe of the archmage. It was just gnome sized.
In 5e, levels 17+ are called epic. Just like levels 1-3 (or 4, I forget) are called apprentice levels. Its in the book.17 and 18 isn't epic level. The only time epic level has been used as a term is when something is post level 20.
*raises eyebrow* The character in question is one of the new Companions (yes, they did expand), and had a larger page count than the barbarian and some rather significant plot points. Kind of a notable character.I'm not sure who had that power either. None of the heroes of the hall are monks. If you mean some of their enemies are very high level or that they have some very high level friends, I won't disagree.
Yes. As I said, I was referring to the pre death version. Post death she is around 6 wizard/6 cleric since she has cast 3rd level spells as both a cleric and wizard. But she's almost always identified as a wizard that also gets powers from her goddess since she spends all her time actually studying magic and just gets her cleric powers by playing for a short while a day. She doesn't seem to like armor, possibly because she is still stuck in older edition rules and can't cast her wizard spells in armor.She's cast Create Undead as a level 3 cleric spell in the Companion books. Healing spells, the Summon Mount spell... and that's just off the top of my head.
I don't know. It's a small dress. I think the only thing it can be worn as is a shirt/blouse of some kind. I think anyone else would have turned it into a shirt since that's the only legitimate way to wear a small dress.WHY was it put on as a blouse? How difficult was it to make it something actually practical other than "Hey, lets put her in something girlish?" Nothing more than tired justification for the same old tropes. If we had a male character getting that same robe, would it have been turned into a shirt, or something else? My money is on the "something else."
The tiers don't really have official titles. In the PHB, it says that PCs of levels 1-4 are "effectively apprentice adventurers", while those of levels 17-20 have become "heroic (or villainous) archetypes in their own right". The DMG is a little more formal, classifying the tiers thusly:In 5e, levels 17+ are called epic. Just like levels 1-3 (or 4, I forget) are called apprentice levels. Its in the book.
Actually, as a female gamer, I feel kinda disgusted over some of what goes into those stories now. "I find a robe of the Archmage! But its small, so its now a blouse for me to wear, since I'm a girl!" Wait, what? Cattibrie is an effin' cleric**. Put her in some armor.