Mr Fidgit: open your DMG, that's where Fiolus got his information from. I have a first-printing DMG, and his quotes match, word for word, what's in mine, too.
Femerus the Gnecro said:
I agree. However, I would appreciate it if you (or someone else) could offer evidence to support this statement.
My friend and I are both horrible rules lawyers, so evidence is necessary. It's a syndrome, really.
-F
DMG page 45, "Leadership" sidebar. Left-hand column, last paragraph,
emphasis mine:
Cohort Level: The character can attract a cohort of up to this level. Regardless of the character's Leadership score, he can't recruit a cohort of his level orhigher. A 6th-level paladin with a +3 Charisma bonus, for example, can still only recruit a cohort of 5thlevel or lower.
Three times, that passage, which specifically deals with the level of a recruited cohort, uses the singular form.
Zero times, ituses the plural form.
Further, table 2-25, on that same page, details both the Cohort maximum level
and the number of followers a given leadership score can attract.
Nowhere is there
specifically defined a maximum number of cohorts you can gain per Leadership feat, per se. This is because a
single cohort is the implicit benefit of the feat.
IF the feat allowed you
limitless cohorts for taking the feat
once ... what would be the point of limiting the number of FOLLOWERS ... ? After all, with a Leadership Score of (for example) 8, you could have a 5th level Cohort, but NO followers.
By your reading of the rules, you could have TWO HUNDRED 5th level cohorts, but still couldn't get a single "follower", with that Leadership Score of 8.
Logic and rational examination with an eye to game balance. As a GM, I -might- allow a second cohort, at half the leadership score,
if the ability to gain followers were given up entirely. IOW, 1 cohort and a variable number of followers, or, two cohorts, one significantly weaker than the others.