Ashrem Bayle
Explorer
So what do we have so far?
10 people sounds like a lot. How on earth will we ever be able to keep things straight?
10 people sounds like a lot. How on earth will we ever be able to keep things straight?
Let's start a game
- Thread starter The Kender
- Start date
reapersaurus
Explorer
I'm not interested in playing a psionic character.
You say that a straight ranger-type is requested?
Would ranger/fighter be OK?
Would i be required to know psionics to play?
You say that a straight ranger-type is requested?
Would ranger/fighter be OK?
Would i be required to know psionics to play?
Ashrem Bayle
Explorer
Nope.
Psionics isn't required at all.
Actually, I'm glad someone is doing something else.
Psionics isn't required at all.
Actually, I'm glad someone is doing something else.
Sir Osis of Liver
Explorer
My near finished charaters in the rogues gallery, i went straight nomad. Will do equiptment and background shortly.
Looks like so far there is:
a cleric
a ranger/savant
a ranger/fighter
a psion/nomad
and a psychic warrior
and a potential ranger/psion
did i miss any one?
Looks like so far there is:
a cleric
a ranger/savant
a ranger/fighter
a psion/nomad
and a psychic warrior
and a potential ranger/psion
did i miss any one?
Last edited:
Ashrem Bayle
Explorer
I was thinking we had a wizard. We need one if we don't. A Rogue would be nice too.
Are we using the "Psionics are different" rule?
Are we using the "Psionics are different" rule?
Other Guy
First Post
I'll take up the role of the wizard!
I've had a concept for a Monk/Wizard for a while, but I do have one question: would you be opposed to a feat that allowed a character to multiclass as a monk as if it were a normal class?
Either way, he'll mostly be a wizard, with just a few monk levels here and there. Part of his history is that he was trained as a monk so that he could have something else to rely on when he ran out of spells. He was also trained in the use of the Longbow (another feat -- he's a human). He has a definite fascination with psionics, but his true talent (and love, luckily for him) is for the arcane arts.
Thanks in advance!
I've had a concept for a Monk/Wizard for a while, but I do have one question: would you be opposed to a feat that allowed a character to multiclass as a monk as if it were a normal class?
Either way, he'll mostly be a wizard, with just a few monk levels here and there. Part of his history is that he was trained as a monk so that he could have something else to rely on when he ran out of spells. He was also trained in the use of the Longbow (another feat -- he's a human). He has a definite fascination with psionics, but his true talent (and love, luckily for him) is for the arcane arts.
Thanks in advance!
Last edited:
Jarval
Explorer
Other Guy: Sure, a feat to freely allow you to muticlass as a monk sounds fine.
reapersaurus: No, you don't have to be psionic. In fact, it'd even the party out a bit if you wern't. And you don't need to know the psionics rules to play.
Ashrem: We are indeed using the "Psionics are Different" variant. Hope this is OK with everyone.
reapersaurus: No, you don't have to be psionic. In fact, it'd even the party out a bit if you wern't. And you don't need to know the psionics rules to play.
Ashrem: We are indeed using the "Psionics are Different" variant. Hope this is OK with everyone.
Sir Osis of Liver
Explorer
Psionics are differnt is fine by me. I think it's more in flavor, for the psionics, that way.
Ashrem Bayle
Explorer
Jarval said:
Cool. Can you give any background on where we'll be starting?
Similar Threads
