DM-Rocco
Explorer
Raven Crowking and Agemegos, not to step on your toes, or to drag this forum onto another 28 pages, but I am assuming that in this quote that Raven Crowking is speaking for you and he in this matter in hopes of trying to wrap this up.But, this argument has become pretty recursive by now, hasn't it?
We agree that the paladin should retain his paladinhood.
We agree that there may have been a better solution.
We do not agree that there necessarily was a better solution.
I can live with that.
I get the feeling that many people think the Paladin was in the wrong and should lose his powers, myself included.
I started out with the position that the Paladin was justified, but I can't get over the fact that he killed the man in cold blood, no warning, nothing.
If he would have warned the man, a completely different story. If he would have at least warned him I could come over to your way of thinking. I would still think it is wrong, but I would be more inclined to agree. The reason I would still have my doubts, even after warning him, was because you as a Paladin should have a morale code that should not allow you to a) kill a man without announcing cause and b) there is no honor in killing an unarmed man (see my earlier posts on page 25).
Anyway, I know that doesn't help the situation, but I just didn't want you making a statement that everyone agrees that he should keep his powers, since there are a lot of people who don't think he should keep them.
Although, I am sure you are referring to the discussion between yourself and Agemegos.