kermit4karate
Explorer
I'm not going to get pulled into some tangential side quest so you can massage your ego in an attempt to weasel out of a position you know is wrong.I think this is kind of funny, because you appear superficially to know so little about digital animation that you can't even describe how they'd be using beyond "Well maybe they use ChatGPT instead of Googling stuff!" and like, yeah, maybe. Last time I had an argument like this it was about static digital art and it rapidly emerged the person literally did not comprehend how digital art was produced, like they didn't understand the process on the most basic level, a level of understanding you could acquire simply by yourself producing some digital art using GIMP or the like. It's fun to use words like "indubitably" but like, it helps to have a more specific basis when claiming that kind of degree of certainty. They'd be fools not to use it to do what exactly?
If all you're saying is "sometimes people use ChatGPT instead of Google!", well, sure. I certainly do if it's something where ChatGPT has eaten all the manuals and discussions and can regurgitate useful bits on command. But it seems like you think there's more to it than that?

This was my original claim. You still haven't moved me off it:
"I don't believe for one second that any top professional in a technical field related to digital animation isn't using AI to perform their job, even if it's as simple as using AI chat queries to replace routine Google searches throughout the day."
You've said a lot of words in response.... Unfortunately, not the right words to address that.
