Three_Haligonians
First Post
Hey all,
A quick question about the Object Reading power (using the 3.5 XPH). I understand the power right up until this part:
My question is about objects that have not been used as weapons. What do you think defines "casual owner"? In my current campaign, for example, one of the PC's has started to recieve annonymous letters that supply her with useful information. The group as a whole are a little worried about getting burned by a mysterious benefactor so they want to track down whose sending them and they think Object Reading will help.
However, I'm not sure if writing a letter is anything more than casual ownership. For that matter what is the "object" here anyway? Is it the letter itself or is it just the piece of paper? If the object is the letter as a whole, then I can see the original owner being the one who wrote it. Otherwise, wouldn't the shopkeep who had the paper be a previous one? The man who physically made the paper be the owner before that?
Am I reading way too much into this? (Pun intended of course..)
Thanks,
J from Three Haligonians
A quick question about the Object Reading power (using the 3.5 XPH). I understand the power right up until this part:
Expanded Psionics Handbook said:This power will not identify casual owners. (Anyone who uses an object to attack someone or something is not thereafter considered a casual user.)
My question is about objects that have not been used as weapons. What do you think defines "casual owner"? In my current campaign, for example, one of the PC's has started to recieve annonymous letters that supply her with useful information. The group as a whole are a little worried about getting burned by a mysterious benefactor so they want to track down whose sending them and they think Object Reading will help.
However, I'm not sure if writing a letter is anything more than casual ownership. For that matter what is the "object" here anyway? Is it the letter itself or is it just the piece of paper? If the object is the letter as a whole, then I can see the original owner being the one who wrote it. Otherwise, wouldn't the shopkeep who had the paper be a previous one? The man who physically made the paper be the owner before that?
Am I reading way too much into this? (Pun intended of course..)
Thanks,
J from Three Haligonians