Reaper Steve said:Love it or loathe it, the word's not going away. In this case, the best thing that could happen would be for WotC to formalize it in a 4E product as a real and important term.
For instance:
"Swordmages, also called Gish, blend arcane magic with swordplay..."
"Some cultures refer to a Swordmage as a Gish."
"Some say swordmages are an attempt to emulate the combined melee and magic prowess of the Githyanki Gish."
Incenjucar said:In two generations, they'll be using these terms as military code.
AFAIk it's new popularity is because of the article about Githyanki society in the incursion issue of Dungeon some time ago.Nikosandros said:it is used in the Fiend Folio as name for Githyanki fighter-magic users, but its generic usage is quite recent... at least in my experience.
And to paladins, clerics, rangers, blackguars, psychic warrior, hexbladem, ... -> AFAIK to the Githyankti any warrior able to cast/manifest something is a member of the gish casteHussar said:FM-U? And you think Gish is confusing. Let's see, it's been years since wizards were called a magic-user, Gish can also refer to a fighter/sorcerer, or any other combination of combat class and arcane spell user.
Piratecat said:It was the official name for a githyanki fighter/mage, first used (I believe) in the 1e Fiend Folio.
Hairfoot said:Chill out, daddy-o. The modern kids are hip to rad wuxia anime warcraft, yo? Ain't groovy to harsh them on account of da way dey rap at ya. If the hep young cats want a blinged-up tank/controller named "w00tHaXXor von ROFL III", it's all cool, man. All cool.
pawsplay said:I don't mean to fly off the handle. I just remember on the CO boards getting tired of,
"I need help with some kind of character. Maybe a bladesinger. Is that good?"
"Bladesingers rate pretty low as gishes. Blah blah blah. Codzilla. Blah blah blah."
"What's a gish?""