Oots #468

PallidPatience said:
Besides slaughtering hobgoblins for the sheer joy of killing living creatures, and using an undead being as a weapon.

Killing armed, attacking hobgoblins isn't necessarily evil. This is D&D! (He didn't actually make the undead being... would you consider the spell control undead to be an [Evil] act? It doesn't have the [Evil] descriptor.)
 

log in or register to remove this ad





We need to remember that Belkar only saved Hinjo to get his Mark of Justice removed, and he really had to think about doing it. Still pretty self-serving.

The "Ugh, biology is disgusting" comment reminded me of Xykon's "biophiliac" bit. :D

grimslade said:
You mean Ensign Slob and Ensign Bastard? Nope we'll get a panel with "Poor Slob!" "Poor Bastard!"

I always called those characters Ensign Gonna-Die...
 


PallidPatience said:
I'm not saying that killing armed attacking hobgoblins is evil. But his motivation is to kill for the love of killing. :P

And Halley's motivation to kill them is (usually) to steal their treasure. And Roy's overriding motivation was revenge (before he decided to conveniently both save the world AND get revenge).

Revenge? Greed? Bloodlust? These don't make you evil. They might earn you a Dark Side point in Star Wars, but in D&D, killing badguys for whatever reason doesn't make you evil. (Or if it does, I have yet to see the rule which states or even implies that it does.)

Your actions and methods count, not your motivation. Otherwise, Miko wouldn't have fallen. Her motivation was righteous! It's just her actions and methods that fell short. ;)

Cheers, -- N
 



Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top