Psionicist said:
Then all of you take this "facts" as granted just because it's about the "evil corporation".
I agree that it's a sorry thing when people believe these kinds of claims about Microsoft. But I don't agree with your reasoning for
why.
Unfortunately for Microsoft, they've followed a path that leads people to believe this kind of thing because (quite frankly) it's usually true. Granted, this claim might not have supporting evidence, but there's enough other evidence about past infractions that this one's likelihood is that much greater.
Put it in gaming terms (obligatory D&D reference follows). You've got a "villain" in your game who's performed all kinds of atrocities in his career. The PCs are out to get him, and in the course of their adventures he continually treads on the weak. One day, the PCs enter a town and hear a story about him doing something evil. They didn't witness it, but it sure sounds like something he'd do. Do your players stop the messenger and say, "Now hold on, buddy! You don't even have any evidence that he did that. How can you say such a thing without proof?" In all likelihood, your PCs will believe the story without question.
If, every day, you hold a rock out at arm's length and drop it, and observe that it falls to the ground, at some point, when someone tells you that they let go of an object and it fell, you'll believe it because you've seen it so many times. If you want to be technical, from a scientific standpoint, there's no
guarantee that that object will fall. But we've observed that behavior for so long, we take it for granted.
The situation here is no different.