Pathfinder 2E Pathfinder 2E Errata

The Pathfinder 2 developers were in a Twitch stream, where they confirmed some errata for the core rules. Thanks to @Markh3rd for the scoop!

• Humans are supposed to have one more language (Common + Bonus + INT).
• Your proficiency in simple weapons is also what your proficiency in unarmed should be, including the wizard. Monk is an exception as they are better at unarmed.
• Ki spells cue off Wisdom for the monk.
• Sorcerer is missing a 17th level Resolve class feature, just the same as the wizard's (includes master will save, critical success, etc.).
• Wizards don't get a 1st level class feat by default. This was a mistake. They only get one for being a universalist.
• The adventurer's pack is only 1 bulk.
• Heroic Recovery takes you to 0 hit points, not 1.

Link to the stream: Twitch

The developers said they will be releasing official critical errata soon as well as monster creation rules (so we will have them before the GameMastery Guide comes out).

 

[R_J_K75]

@R_J_K75 ist right, this shouldn't happen today. Why not realease the PDF a couple of months early, let people take a look at it, and print the book with the errata? Pinnacle did this for their SWADE and it kinda worked. Not everything was fixed before the printing but most of it did.

Everything that comes later (bugfixes) are something else, that is to be expected.

I totally agree. I don't have the answer but I'm quite certain that something can be done to minimize the need for errata. Distributing a pre-print .pdf sounds like a good idea. A second or third set of eyes never hurts. When you work on something for a long time, you can proof read it and check it as much as you want and never find all the mistakes because you're no longer looking at it objectively. Give it to someone else and they'll find the mistakes pretty quickly.

 

[CapnZapp]

@R_J_K75 ist right, this shouldn't happen today.

While I would love if your sentiment had any practical application, I don't see this ceasing to happen today, tomorrow or years from now.

There simply is no incentive to pay extra costs for external proof-reading or playtesting, or those incurred by delayed publications.

 

[R_J_K75]

While I would love if your sentiment had any practical application, I don't see this ceasing to happen today, tomorrow or years from now.

There simply is no incentive to pay extra costs for external proof-reading or playtesting, or those incurred by delayed publications.

Whether a company takes steps before a book is printed to avoid or minimize errata, or compiling it and distributing it online and then incorporating it into future printings, they're incurring costs either way.

 

[stadi]

Another example is the Odyssey of the Dragonlords Kickstarter. Backers got the 80% finished version, they can send feedback now, and will probably receive the finished version for proofreading before it is sent to the printer.

A company like Paizo with the amount of products they have wouldn't be able to do this for every product, but for the core book it would make sense.

 

[Gallagor]

The RPG industry is more akin to programming than manufacturing. Patches are a thing in any complex software product (games or otherwise). And at hundreds of pages / thousands of lines RPG books are complex products. The easy problems are found in alpha or beta testing, but some always seem to sneak through. Software does have an advantage over RPGs though. The patch gets downloaded and applied. Done. An RPG book being a manufactured object... well you can print out the errata, write it into the margins yourself, or wait until the next printing. Given the possibility of yet more errata cropping up, waiting is not always the best option I appreciate the attitude of you (and your company) but the situations in a small industry with relatively low profit levels and a product that can't be easily "fixed" (no recalls) is not typical of manufacturing.

That. I totally agree.

 

[R_J_K75]

Another example is the Odyssey of the Dragonlords Kickstarter. Backers got the 80% finished version, they can send feedback now, and will probably receive the finished version for proofreading before it is sent to the printer.

A company like Paizo with the amount of products they have wouldn't be able to do this for every product, but for the core book it would make sense.

Just goes to show that it can be and has been done. With how easy it is to reach your customers in this day and age it makes sense to take advantage of the opportunity. With the slower product schedule WotC has adopted seems totally feasible for them to do.

 

[CapnZapp]

Whether a company takes steps before a book is printed to avoid or minimize errata, or compiling it and distributing it online and then incorporating it into future printings, they're incurring costs either way.

Okay?

The option of delaying costs until your product has been proven successful is infinitely preferable, as 99% of market practice clearly attest to.

The reason is simple: post release support can be paid for with profit from sales; pre-release QA must be paid for with the invariably strained launch budget.

Also, making sure the product is perfect at launch might never recoup its costs (if the product was t successful enough).

Look, it boils down to a very simple question: Does success in the ttrpg business depend on launching errata-free products?

And the answer is a resounding "not even a little".

Regards

 

[dave2008]

Just goes to show that it can be and has been done. With how easy it is to reach your customers in this day and age it makes sense to take advantage of the opportunity. With the slower product schedule WotC has adopted seems totally feasible for them to do.

A small publisher on kickstarter is not the same thing as Pazio or WotC. And distributing an 80% copy to your kickstarter backers is not the same as releasing your core-rulebook to the public. Finally, after the process Odyssey of the Dragonlords may still have errata. Remember, PF2e printed and sold a PF2e playtest document, that got feedback for months ( a year?) and it still had eratta when the final product was released. Paizo essential did what you asked for an it still had errata!

 

[Acolyte of Zothique]

I recall the initial errata for the 5e core books to be fairly minimal and very little of it was serious changes to rules, more like typos and clarifications. WotC did pretty well. So it is possible for a large RPG publisher to ensure most errors are caught.

 

[Morrus]

This is only a list of 7 items. If that's the errata, that's a pretty impressively small list.