Man those WotC guys know how to tease, the cheeky devils. He comes onto a thread about what classes in the PHB? No one here really knows, so what does he do? He answers a question about how many pages in the combat chapter and tells us the font is bigger! LOLWotC_Logan said:Don't forget that the game goes to level 30! That makes the classes' page count longer, too.
I was curious to see if the combat chapter is actually shorter, so I checked. It's actually several pages longer. Of course, one page of that is art, the chapter incorporates some of the stuff that would have been found in the "Magic" chapter in 3.5 (like areas of effect), there are more bulleted lists and callouts, and the font's not as tiny.
I wouldn't be too confident in your "3 new classes per additional PH" number.![]()
Warlocks will get summoning (or at least, that was the plan at the time of R&C). Possibly no-one will get shapechanging in the first PHB -my understanding was that it doesn't specify that shapechanging creature descriptions will be in PHB1; just that they will be in the text of any shapechanging powers in any book.devoblue said:What classes in PHB1 get summoning or shapechanging effects?
There is nothing particularly special about spells descriptions. Spells are just one type of powers of the many. EDIT: As I understand it. I don't have any special knowledge or anything.devoblue said:Why suprised? Probably absent mindedness. The statement that the effects of shapechanging being included with the shapechanging power didn't cause me to imediately conclude that they were refering to a wizard power. But if they do infact include all such effects for wizard powers then that would imply that they are dropping stat blocks in the middle of spell descriptions (which would be suprising), or radically changing how those spells are working.
devoblue said:What classes in PHB1 get summoning or shapechanging effects?
Mike Mearls said:You can totally do a no magic game with the PH by sticking to the fighter, rogue, warlord, and ranger.
Not to mention there was a 4E Design and Development article specifically about Paladin smiting.Scholar & Brutalman said:And we know the Warlock is in. I don't recall a quote that says the Paladin is definitely in the PHB1, but it's been in a whole lot of playtests.
Scholar & Brutalman said:While Mike attempted to withdraw Logan Bonner's earlier "8 classes in the PHB1" quote, I think it still looks the most likely number.