Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?

I know you're kidding but sadly, I remember a couple of my friends having a nasty argument about ascending armor class in the early 2000s. We're talking shouting red faces, shaking fists, little flecks of spittle at the corner of their mouths, all of it. The whole awful display was surreal to watch.

One of them (let's call him Kevin) was especially salty about it. "It's not real D&D!" he bellowed. "Real D&D has THAC0!" He was mostly upset because it meant that he would have to convert all of his modules and characters and stuff if he wanted to use them under the d20 System. But he was also upset because in the war of ascending vs. descending Armor Class, this was a definitive loss.

"Oh is that a problem?" the other guy (let's call him Chad) would fire back. "I thought you said thay-co is easy! I thought you said anyone can just do it in their head! You always tells us to stop pretending math is hard!" Chad was, and probably still is, a sarcastic jerk.

They almost came to blows over it.
If you felt like lobbing a grenade at the whole mess, you could have piped up from the peanut gallery: "Uh... can someone explain to me Damage on a Miss? It looks like a great mechanic!"

But seriously, I ran at cons for over twenty years. I've seen things...
 

log in or register to remove this ad




It's probably wrong of me, but I so want you to follow this up with, "...and that's how they got together. They've been married now for 11 years."
I haven't seen either of them since I moved away in 2006, so maybe?

If you felt like lobbing a grenade at the whole mess, you could have piped up from the peanut gallery: "Uh... can someone explain to me Damage on a Miss? It looks like a great mechanic!"
I imagine someone would have gotten shot.
 


I admit language can help with both romance and dealing with kids.

But, cos I'm feeling mildly argumentative, romance can be done exclusively with the eyes. Just ask Rudolph Valentino.

As for children, my sister-in-law uses the "bribe 'em with treats" method. Yes, words help. Except when they don't.

Atcherly, I don't feel argumentative at all. Just wanted to make a couple of dumb jokes.
There's a reason why he did it with his eyes. Ever wonder why his career ended when movies went Talkies? ;)
 

I know you're kidding but sadly, I remember a couple of my friends having a nasty argument about ascending armor class in the early 2000s. We're talking shouting red faces, shaking fists, little flecks of spittle at the corner of their mouths, all of it. The whole awful display was surreal to watch.

One of them (let's call him Kevin) was especially salty about it. "It's not real D&D!" he bellowed. "Real D&D has THAC0!" He was mostly upset because it meant that he would have to convert all of his modules and characters and stuff if he wanted to use them under the d20 System. But he was also upset because in the war of ascending vs. descending Armor Class, this was a definitive loss.

"Oh is that a problem?" the other guy (let's call him Chad) would fire back. "I thought you said thay-co is easy! I thought you said anyone can just do it in their head! You always tells us to stop pretending math is hard!" Chad was, and probably still is, a sarcastic jerk.

They almost came to blows over it.
What's crazy is that THAC0 was meant to simplify the process of adjudicating combat at the table.

"No, no, we don't want to make it easier or speed up combat more" is a wild hill to angrily die on.
 



Remove ads

Top