I'm saying that most literature classes--especially below college level, but also including 100 and maybe some 200 level stuff--feature instructors making unsupported assertions (or at least failing to adequate support their assertions) about literary works and testing their students on those assertions (learn them or fail!). Making your own assertions is a quick and easy way to receive failing grades, or at least it was; learning to come to your own conclusions about a given piece--its meaning/s, its intention/s--was never really on-offer.Sorry, what isn't how literature is mostly taught? Are you suggesting that MOST literature classes are teaching students to make unsupported assertions?![]()
Obviously our experiences can be different--probably are! I wish I'd had instructors like you, instead of what I mostly had.
(EDIT: Also, you seem to be replying to someone I cannot see, who IIRC has much stronger opinions on "literature" than I do. I'm saying literature is, or at least has been, mostly taught poorly. I'm not saying analysis is always and forever useless or bad, just that it's at least sometimes wrong.)

