Pretty sure. Yeah.
The game is an inanimate object, most likely in the form of a book or boxed set. It has no intentionality. It has no consciousness. It's neither haunted nor magical. It's lifeless. Only the people who play it can behave in any particular way. They might be attracted to that specific game because of other reasons, such as a cult of personality of the creator or bigotry or politics or religion, etc. But the game itself can't be at fault. The fan can. It can't be the game's fault for the fans being obnoxious.
There are two specific games whose fandom's I find to be aggressively offensive. Bringing them up in discussion has become a red flag for me. The fans who evangelize them have occupied an inordinate number of slots on my ignore list.
I get that. If I were to do the same for my red flag game this place would be a ghost town.
But I don't actually dislike the games. I would play them with people I know. I often wonder what the correlation and/or causation is. I have theories, but they're just guesses.
Mostly the same. I'm just tired of the One Game to Rule Them All and the inability to get much gaming in without people trying to claw their way back to The Precious.
All true. And I'll add that I've seen plenty of bad behavior from both the fans and the detractors.
Both sides is never really a convincing claim. When you're the dominant culture in an area any kind of criticism, no matter how meek and mild can feel like being personally attacked. At a guess that's mostly what's happening around here. People have the audacity to not love The Precious, so those who do get all bent out of shape.
Let people like the stuff they like, sheesh.
Yep. And let people play the games they like, too.
Trouble is, there's one game hoovering up almost all the time, attention, and players...leaving basically nothing for any other game. And when anyone mentions this, the typical response is some version of "sucks to be you," "sounds like a you problem," or "well leave the hobby then."
These sides are not equivalent.