Micah Sweet
Level Up & OSR Enthusiast
Sci fi doesn't have to explain the how, but it does have to indicate that there is a scientific explanation, even if we dont know what it is. In that way, yes Doctor Who is a bit of an outlier, as it generally doesn't even try to explain. I would certainly not define most sci fi as like Doctor Who in that way.But, you just contradicted yourself.
If the "HOW" matters, and your nod to scientific plausibility does not in any way actually address "HOW", then by your own definition, it's not SF.
So, how am I being insulting to the concept of SF by insisting that your telepathy in a setting be actually given any sort of explanation as to how it works? After all, in Star Trek, there is no explanation for how telepathy works - it just does. Which is perfectly fine, by the way. SF in no way actually HAS to explain the how's, that's something that @Minigiant and apparently you have insisted on.
By your definition, most SF, like Doctor Who, isn't actually SF.
By the way, if you do explain the how, you should probably do so in a way that sounds scientifically plausible if you stretch your brain a bit. That is what I was referring to in my earlier post. You certainly don't have to (as in Doctor Who), but it pretty common in sci fi to do so.