D&D 5E (2024) Rate D&D 2024

[Horwath]

Er...that isn't à la carte MC? Because you've limited it to only two classes, and you've made it either a fundamental thing, or something you rebuild your character to use.

Sorry, didnt make myself clear.
I would rather have free Multiclassing that no multiclassing at all, no matter if it gets slightly off the rails.
But, my suggestions are to keep the essence of 5E multiclassing, but keeping it in line.

yes, it's similar to 2E in solution.

we played that, worked great.

3/3 dual class is about the same as 5 single class and
7/7 dual class is more or less(depending on classes) as 11 levels in single class.

 

[FrogReaver]

I use my beer scale and tweak it for movies, D&D.

10. Greatest thing ever (almost never for me 9.5 is usually highest 9 go).
9. Excellent
8. Very good
7. Good
6. Average
5. Below average/mid
4. Force myself to drink it.
4. Give up 3/4th
3. Give up halfway
2. Give up around 25%
1. 1-2 mouthful awful.

And my point was that to make such ratings you implicitly must be comparing to other beers.

 

[Zardnaar]

And my point was that to make such ratings you implicitly must be comparing to other beers.

I rated all the D&Ds earlier.

I gave 5.5 comparatively high rating in a vacuum (judged by itself, ignoring WotC corporate stupidity).

BUT because its a revision its hard to get excited after 10 years of 5.0.

 

[Reynard]

See also @Reynard's 22,500+ post thread, D&D General - [rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.

I refuse to take responsibility for that monstrosity. I was half drunk when I wrote the OP and expected it to fade into obscurity within the hour.

 

[Reynard]

It is weird that folks seem okay ignoring the lowest ratings as from"haters" but not the highest ratings as from sycophants.

 

[Zardnaar]

I refuse to take responsibility for that monstrosity. I was half drunk when I wrote the OP and expected it to fade into obscurity within the hour.

You broke it you bought it.

 

[Horwath]

It is weird that folks seem okay ignoring the lowest ratings as from"haters" but not the highest ratings as from sycophants.

I ignore all rankings that are 3 or more ranks away from my ranking.
I admit I am maybe slightly wrong on all rankings, but I refuse that I am that wrong. hahaha.

 

[Micah Sweet]

then I am not sure why you were comparing it to one for WFRPG


for new players why not? I am sure they would prefer one revised PHB over three books, same for a DM


and added a bunch of changes to much of its content

Better organization, new art could all have been done either way


I agree, my option was to drop 5e altogether

What do you play now?

 

[Bae'zel]

It's kind of pointless to debate personal taste or convictions.

People like or hate D&D on their own scales of mechanical preferences, game playstyles, personal ideologies or approval of the publisher / writers. I'm willing to bet that there are people who have NO issue with the system but give a low ranking because of personal gripes with WotC. Or the inverse: people who are devoted to the D&D brand, regardless of whether or not they actually like the current system.

Not sure what people are debating here. "Your personal rank of 3 out of 10 is WRONG". WTF? Who cares.

 

[Micah Sweet]

Sorry, didnt make myself clear.
I would rather have free Multiclassing that no multiclassing at all, no matter if it gets slightly off the rails.
But, my suggestions are to keep the essence of 5E multiclassing, but keeping it in line.

yes, it's similar to 2E in solution.

we played that, worked great.

3/3 dual class is about the same as 5 single class and
7/7 dual class is more or less(depending on classes) as 11 levels in single class.

The only thing I like multiclassing for is A5e's synergy feats, which would be easy to maintain in your system (they just require three levels in two classes).

Also I loved 2e. So this works for me.