part 2
Flyspeck23 said:
Favorites:
- Grievous and the four lightsabers (didn't watch Clone Wars though, so I can't compare)
It's in the second series; I however preferred how he fought in the first series (he did a fair bit of spinning/rotating around switching lightsabers between his hands and feet).
sniffles said:
I am still convinced that George Lucas cannot write good dialog, except for the occasional humorous line. Some of the dialog was cringe-inducing. He's also a master of making events fit his overarcing story and logic be damned; i.e., they have bacta fluid and droids in the Star Wars universe, but apparently they don't have ultrasound, because Padme didn't know she was having twins.
Well, the future lacks certain modern day basics, such as basic forensic science (fingerprints? never heard of them!).
qstor said:
I didn't have a problem with the Wookies. For me it was the flow of the movie, too much cutting back and forth. I didnt get the feeling that 9 months for the pregnancy had gone by more like 2 weeks at most.
Well it was clear she was already pregnant and Anakin had been away for a while, so it stands to reason she was already pretty far along and it just wasn't shown for whatever reason (whether she was hiding it or bad film making).
Ashrem Bayle said:
1. I got the impression that Darth Plagus was Sideous' master. So, Sideous knew the secrets of immortality and creating life. Right? So did Sideous create Anakin? If so, why didn't Anakin react more to this revelation? "Anakin! I am your FATHER!"
It was never established Anakin knew about that (as I recall), an I suspect he didn't.
3. The dreams. Real or planted by Sideous?
Up to us, I like the idea of plants though. It also explains how Palpy knew about them.
4. The Prophecy. What happened with this. I figure the Jedi misunderstood it as Yoda implied. Instead of killing the Sith, he estabolished a true balance. There were two Sith, and in the end, there were two Jedi.
What you need to do is understand what the characters/Lucas meant by balance (a poorly chosen word), it has nothing to do with equal numbers and is about removing the taint of the darkside, which anakin eventually does with Luke's help.
Mystery Man said:
OK help me out here!
Mace and Emperor battle, my position is that the Emperor was playing helpless and could have put the wood to Mace anytime he wanted. He was just doing that to get Anakin to turn.
Agree? Disagree?
Disagree, Mace was supposed to be one of the most powerful Jedi and one of the best fighters, so his taking out Plapy wasn't surprising. Doesn't preclude some hamming up for Anakin though.
Brother Shatterstone said:
I love the fact that Palpatine used everyone as tools… Even Vader was a tool. If Luke had turned he quickly would have replaced him without ceremony…

(Or at least without much, I think Palpatine did honestly consider Vader a friend... though I use the term loosely in regard to Palpatine whom I doubt ever has a true friend.)
He'd probably qualify as a true psychopath, in which case he would even understand the concept.
John Crichton said:
I'm thinking that it was because he dropped his disguise. The face was certainly distorted in the holo-net transmissions. It was we'll timed as it probably took concentration to keep the charade going. Not having to do it in public was probably a relief. Simply being a Sith Lord for as long as he was would have made him look like that pretty quickly.
I disagree on this point, I don't think he looks that different in the holograms (and I was looking closely when I watched Ep2&3 recently). Plus Palpatine has gotten noticeably worse looking through the prequels.
Jeremy said:
Vader's "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!"
Whiny Vader sucks. Angry Vader is ok. Menacing Vader would have been much better.
I have no problem with whiny Anakin/Vader, because that's what leads to menacing Vader. Remember he has almost twenty years to go from what we see in Ep3 to what we see in Ep4, that's a lot of time to stew and become hardened and bitter.
John Crichton said:
This debate has been raging on other boards and I have stayed away. The implication that Plagus was his master and created Anakin will be debated for years and is the great mystery of this movie. Palpatine also says that he doesn't know how to save Padme but with Anakin's help they could find the secret. He could have been lying but if we take him at face value than Palpatine couldn't have created him, but maybe Plagus did.
I suspect one of them created Anakin, but Palpatine was simply lying about saving Padme, whatever the reason, he's a sith after all and we know he was trying to manipulate Anakin into convert him. So even if he could, why would he?
CrusaderX said:
I found it a bit odd that the whole Jedi Master Sifo-Dyas mystery from Episode II wasn't mentioned at all in III.
There’s no need, I haven't read the book yet and it's easy enough just from Ep2 to figure out it was just another sham perpetrated by Palpatine.