Spell Penetration -- you are the weakest link! Begone!
I have seen every feat on this list used, except Spell Penetration.
I can't see why all the melee/martial feats should go when they are all used very extensively.
I am pretty sure that my party has no idea that SP exists nor when exactly it would need to be used.
If you get rid of Power Attack, there goes what 4 more feats due to dependencies. What would you do then?
The arguement that if you stand in front of the archer you deserve to get shot is complete BS. Precise Shot exists to allow the archer the option of shooting into combat without injury to friends. Not everyone who takes Precise Shot is a combantant, it can be used quite well by a Wizard or Sorceror, once they've run out of useful spells. Or by a rogue that is shooting from a hidden location, so they could benefit from their Sneak Attack damage without showing themselves to the enemy (snipping).
So Spell Penetration must go.
I have seen every feat on this list used, except Spell Penetration.
I can't see why all the melee/martial feats should go when they are all used very extensively.
I am pretty sure that my party has no idea that SP exists nor when exactly it would need to be used.
If you get rid of Power Attack, there goes what 4 more feats due to dependencies. What would you do then?
The arguement that if you stand in front of the archer you deserve to get shot is complete BS. Precise Shot exists to allow the archer the option of shooting into combat without injury to friends. Not everyone who takes Precise Shot is a combantant, it can be used quite well by a Wizard or Sorceror, once they've run out of useful spells. Or by a rogue that is shooting from a hidden location, so they could benefit from their Sneak Attack damage without showing themselves to the enemy (snipping).
So Spell Penetration must go.