TeutonicBerserker
Explorer
.
Last edited:
15% likely to make something up is not "largely liars," nor is a 20% chance to be or work with a thief an implication that they are "largely thieves." Hell, they aren't even 20% like to be a thief, only be OR work with one, which isn't unusual for a prostitute. For all you know it's 5% chance of being a thief and 95% not, but with a 15% chance to work with one. You're greatly overexaggerating the implications of that table.Two things. First, it WAS silly even at the time, and quickly realized as such almost immediately and thus removed later. Largely because while yes, one could encounter a sex worker in a city, it was unusually robust for an entry, and the implication that sex workers are largely liars and thieves is problematic.
In 2011? Neither did I. Turns out I'm both though!Ten years ago, I don't know that I would have known what an ace person was, or the term nonbinary. Times will continue to change.
Everybody has blinders on. We are all products of our limited experiences. There's nothing about cishet male that makes you in any way out of the ordinary in that regard. You could have left that part out and been just as accurate.I specifically said I knew many of the obvious ones, but as a cishet male, I have blinders on and want to know other things I may have missed. You know, the whole point of this thread.
Yes, but "European style" is just as much a pastiche, in D&D. Norman knights, and Hungarian boyars, and Spanish conquistadores, and Teutonic crusaders, and Polish hussars, and Pictish warriors, are all "European", yet nobody bats an eye when they get lumped together as "vanilla D&D" style.
Anyway, I'm completely on board with getting non-European cultures represented in gaming, but if "European" is good enough a category to lump everything together, so should "Asian" or "African" or "South-American".
I think that the origins of D&D from Midwest "White" America wargaming probably has some bearing on why D&D often presents European cultures and peoples as a pastiche. Similarly, the "nobody" who "bats an eye" are likewise most typically* North Americans. As to whether people truly "bat an eye" about these things, I like to point to the horned viking helmets that were once fairly common in D&D art and how those have increasingly vanished in D&D art concurrently with the dissemination of the debunking of this ahistorical depiction of the Norse. This sort of thing happens regularly in the hobby, but the process of challenging European pastiche in D&D is often met with far less resistance, so it transpires far more peacefully and without too much notice.As I said, I am FOR more representation of different cultures, but I fear that (as seen with OA in the past) there will be criticism of "pastiche", while disregarding the fact that ALL of D&D is pastiche.
(...) I like to point to the horned viking helmets that were once fairly common in D&D art and how those have increasingly vanished in D&D art concurrently with the dissemination of the debunking of this ahistorical depiction of the Norse.
And how many editions and decades ago were they introduced?Yeah, instead of helmets with horns, we now got funny looking humans with horns.![]()
15% likely to make something up is not "largely liars," nor is a 20% chance to be or work with a thief an implication that they are "largely thieves." Hell, they aren't even 20% like to be a thief, only be OR work with one, which isn't unusual for a prostitute. For all you know it's 5% chance of being a thief and 95% not, but with a 15% chance to work with one. You're greatly overexaggerating the implications of that table.
These two statements are great examples of why this thread needs to exist in the first place. Being a cishet male is very much extra ordinary, because it means I haven't had to face a bucketload of issues or potential problematic challenges many others who aren't cishet males have to face. I.e., my blinders are significantly different than someone else's, and that difference is important. There is no even playing field here between all genders, ethnicities, and religions, especially when it comes to the context of how old school D&D was presented.Everybody has blinders on. We are all products of our limited experiences. There's nothing about cishet male that makes you in any way out of the ordinary in that regard. You could have left that part out and been just as accurate.
I belong to the one you mentioned. Here's the thing, though. 15% of everybody being liars is very low. The percentage is much higher than that. UMass researcher finds most people lie in everyday conversationTell any ethnic group or minority group that 15% are likely liars and 20% hang out with thieves and then tell me that they are greatly overreacting when they take offense to that.
No, it's really not, which is the issue people have with it. A straight white male has no more or less blinders on than a gay black male or a hispanic straight female. We just have different blinders. You aren't special in that regard.These two statements are great examples of why this thread needs to exist in the first place. Being a cishet male is very much extra ordinary, because it means I haven't had to face a bucketload of issues or potential problematic challenges many others who aren't cishet males have to face.
I didn't say we have the same blinders on.The implication that that someone who enjoys a ton of privilege by being in the largest group and the target demographic has the same blinders on as a minority because we're all the same is ludacris.
These two statements are great examples of why this thread needs to exist in the first place. Being a cishet male is very much extra ordinary, because it means I haven't had to face a bucketload of issues or potential problematic challenges many others who aren't cishet males have to face. I.e., my blinders are significantly different than someone else's, and that difference is important. There is no even playing field here between all genders, ethnicities, and religions, especially when it comes to the context of how old school D&D was presented.
The implication that that someone who enjoys a ton of privilege by being in the largest group and the target demographic has the same blinders on as a minority because we're all the same is ludacris.
I belong to the one you mentioned. Here's the thing, though. 15% of everybody being liars is very low. The percentage is much higher than that. UMass researcher finds most people lie in everyday conversation
Where you went wrong is in making it about race, instead of socioeconomic class like the DMG. You created a False Equivalence. The DMG states lie to get money, which is fairly common among the destitute, such as most prostitutes.
You know what else the really poor do a lot? Steal to survive. A higher percentage of the really poor steal. And an even higher percentage of people(of all races and classes) have stolen at some point during their lives, making them thieves. I think pretty close to 100% of those of us who work, work with thieves(people who have stolen). But again, you created the False Equivalence by linking it to race, rather than socioeconomic class.
What that chart was doing was simply acknowledging the facts of the situation that most prostitutes are in. In fact, it gave lower percentages than the reality would warrant.
No, it's really not, which is the issue people have with it. A straight white male has no more or less blinders on than a gay black male or a hispanic straight female. We just have different blinders. You aren't special in that regard.
All blinders create problems. I've twice had someone in a minority group go off on me and falsely accuse me of racism due to their blinders. One later came back to me and apologized. The other got pulled away from me by another member of the same race who realized the mistake he was making, shortly before it was going to become a fight.
Blinders are an issue regardless or race or gender. We should absolutely seek to overcome those blinders, but we should seek to own a greater share of them than we have.
I didn't say we have the same blinders on.
Well, this assumes that the experience of people who have similar identities are the same. Which, well, as you say: It is ludacris. The idea that every cishet male received the same privileges as every other one is manifestly untrue, just as untrue as assuming every person who identifies with a minority group had equal discriminatory experiences or experienced equal struggles. Many traditionally discriminated groups have found solace in role-playing games such as D&D and it allows them to explore things in a way that they simply cannot in real life. This is also true for members of groups that traditionally hold power.
A cishet male born into poverty most absolutely experiences a ton of problematic challenges that someone who was born in a more well-to-do household never has to deal with, even if they are a minority in race or sexuality. (I fully realize that someone in a minority group is far more likely to belong to a lower economic group but it is a mistake to assume all members of a minority are poor and powerless and all white folk are well-off and wield power). Growing up, for example, I could not afford any of the modules or anything and that greatly shaped how I play now today: I got by not using them at all and played drawing inspiration from other sources, namely a lot of the library books I would pour through. So, today, I find I simply have no interest in such material since I never really played with them and I do not view them as adding value to my D&D experience.
That said, my experience is no more valuable or worthy of consideration than someone's who was born well off, who had easy access to the latest official materials and a wealth of sourcebooks. It is in fact helpful to consider BOTH of our viewpoints. Especially in regards to the hobby of D&D.
The same goes for demographical experience. An african-americans experience with the hobby definitely has value and should be examined but they are not intrinsically more valuable than an asians or someone from england, or what have you. All should be heard and be given weight and have a voice. As soon as we start listening to someone not because of their ideas or words but simply because of the color of their skin or their gender, well...the groups that have traditionally done that were never good ones.
You are wasting your time Sacrosanct. They have no interest in reading the research or arguing in any type of good faith. These are people who do not acknowledge that racism is a problem unless it affects them. Then "Other people" are the real racists.I have literally given presentations on things like this, for years. You both are wrong, and making the same common mistakes. And as someone who grew up in poverty, while yes, wealth is a big impact to privilege, it does not erase all the other privilege I enjoyed as a straight white man. I hear that objection all the time: some variation of "I grew up poor, I don't have privilege!"
Don't take my word for it (even though I'm very well researched on the issue), just go look up articles on privilege from people who make their careers on the subject. Here are some related articles on the subject:
ACLU (2020). Police Militarization. Police Militarization
Akpan, Nsikan (2018). Police Militarization Fails to Protect Officers and Targets Black Communities, Study Finds. Police militarization fails to protect officers and targets black communities, study finds
Alberta Civil Liberties Research Center (2020). Anti-Racism Defined. http://www.aclrc.com/antiracism-defined
American Psychological Association (2018). Harmful Masculinity and Violence. Harmful masculinity and violence
Associated Press (2020). 3 Men with Ties to Right Wing Extremists Plotted to Terrorize Las Vegas Protests. 3 men with ties to right-wing extremists plotted to terrorize Vegas protests, prosecutors say
Berkman, Brenda & Floren, Teresa, & Willing, Linda (1999). Many Faces, One Purpose, A Guide to Women in Firefighting. Pgs 68-70.
CNN (2020). LGBTQ Rights Milestones. LGBTQ Rights Milestones Fast Facts - CNN
Edmondson, Catie (2020). Democrats Unveil Sweeping Bill Targeting Police Misconduct and Racial Bias. Democrats Unveil Sweeping Bill Targeting Police Misconduct and Racial Bias
FBI (2020). FBI Clearances Statistics, 2017. Clearances
George, Alice (2018). The Kerner Commission Got it Right, But Nobody Listened. The Militarization of America's Police: A Brief History | Brian Miller
Goristo, Daniel (2019) Smartphone Data Show Voters in Black Neighborhoods Wait Longer. Smartphone Data Show Voters in Black Neighborhoods Wait Longer
Gross, Terry (2017). A ‘Forgotten History’ of How the US Government Segregated America.
Grim, Ryan & Schwarz, Jon (2020). A Short History of Law Enforcement Infiltrating Protests. A Short History of U.S. Law Enforcement Infiltrating Protests
Grisales, Claudia (2020). Led By Tim Scott, Senate Republicans Begin to Draft Their Own Police Reform Plan. Led By Tim Scott, Senate Republicans Begin Drafting Their Own Police Reform Plan
Hess, Peter (2016). Research Shows That Toxic Masculinity is Harmful to Mens’ Mental Health. Sexism may be bad for men's mental health
Holck, Lotte (2018). Diversity Leads to Greater Social Coherence and Well Being. Diversity leads to greater social coherence and well-being
Keshtan, Miki, Ph. D. (2016). You’re Not a Bad Person: Facing Privilege Can Be Liberating. You’re Not a Bad Person: Facing Privilege Can Be Liberating
Libman, Alyn & Marzullo, Michelle (2012). Hate Crime and Violence Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People. https://assets2.hrc.org/files/asset...50.2146892124.1591819492-714082728.1591819492
McKesson, DeRay & Sinyangwe, Samuel (2020). Police Violence Mapping. Mapping Police Violence
Meade-Kelly, Veronica (2015) Male or Female? It’s Not Always So Simple. Male or female? It's not always so simple
Miller, Brian (2019). The Militarization of America’s Police, A Brief History. The Militarization of America's Police: A Brief History | Brian Miller
Mintchev, Nikolay & Moore, Henrietta (2016). Super Diversity and the Prosperous Society. SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Mottola, Gary R, Ph.D. (2012). In Our Best Interests: Women, Financial Literacy, and Credit Card Behavior. Violence against women
National Sexual Violence Research Center (2020). Statistics
Payscale (2020). The State of the Gender Pay Gap. Gender Pay Gap Statistics for 2020 | PayScale
People Management Editorial (2017). Diversity Drives Better Decisions. Diversity drives better decisions
Reynolds, Katie (2019) 13 Benefits and Challenges of Cultural Diversity in the Workplace. 13 benefits and challenges of cultural diversity in the workplace | Hult International Business School
Schepers, Emile (2017) Agents Provocateurs and the Manipulation of the Radial Left. Agents provocateurs and the manipulation of the radical left
Shutack, Corinne (2017). 75 Things White People Can Do For Racial Justice.
Stanley, Jay (2015). We Need to Move Beyond the Frame of the Bad Apple Cop. We Need to Move Beyond the Frame of the “Bad Apple Cop”
Stop Harassment (2020). http://www.stopstreetharassment.org/resources/statistics/
The Guardian (2009) G20 Police Used Undercover Men to Incite Crowds. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/may/10/g20-policing-agent-provacateurs
Toohey, Karen (2013). Waiter, Is that Inclusion In My Soup?. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/d...oitte-au-hc-diversity-inclusion-soup-0513.pdf
Turner, K. B. , Giacopassi , D. , & Vandiver , M. (2006) . Ignoring the Past: Coverage of Slavery and Slave Patrols in Criminal Justice Texts. Journal of Criminal Justice
Walker, Laura (2012). Workplace Violence and the Bad Apple Myth. https://www.ehstoday.com/safety/article/21915030/workplace-violence-and-the-bad-apple-myth
Waxman, Olivia M (2017) How the U.S. Got Its Police Force, https://time.com/4779112/police-history-origins/
Williams, Timothy (2019). What Are Red Flag Laws, and How Do They Work? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/us/red-flag-laws.html
World Health Organization (2017). Violence Against Women. Violence against women
I'm a big fan of social privilege theory, and like you I often hear the "I was poor I didn't have privilege" argument, and while I agree with you here I think you've misunderstood HJFudge in this case. He didn't argue that being poor erased all the privilege associated with being white just that the experience of all cishet males are not the same. A cishet male who grew up in poverty likely has a very different experience than a cishet male who grew up middle class or wealthy. I think they call it intersectionality.I have literally given presentations on things like this, for years. You both are wrong, and making the same common mistakes. And as someone who grew up in poverty, while yes, wealth is a big impact to privilege, it does not erase all the other privilege I enjoyed as a straight white man. I hear that objection all the time: some variation of "I grew up poor, I don't have privilege!"