JoeGKushner said:
Hearing from two of the authors is a plus. I can understand there being 'space restrictions' but if you look at the book, it doesn't appear that there are any space restrictions on size or layout.
Maybe I'm just getting grumpier as I get old or just more picky as there is so much material out.
...
Maybe it's just feeling less satisfied with SL books in general. Faithful and Forsaken isn't looking too good, didn't like that Penumbral Pentagram bit, the Creature Collection Revised still had some issues and still used that dog ugly art. I like SL but these books are starting to pushing my buttons the wrong way.
Well, at the very least, you're not alone in your diminishing satisfaction. For me, it was first drifting towards aspects of D&D that just never jived with me, such as psionics, that I can at least acknowledge other folk like, and then just bland to poor writing to go along with the consistently bad mechanics. There's also the recent references in a couple of books to templates or monsters that didn't show up in the books which they were supposed to show up in, and still haven't made any appearance yet.
I don't have a personal problem with Scarred Lands specific setting books, though. However, I do have a problem when they go around claiming they're useful for any d20 campaign, when they're not, like the recent Player's Guides, and apparently the asaatthi book as well (which makes a similar claim). False or just mistaken advertising doesn't exactly endear me.
As it is, the only Scarred Lands book that catches my interest for the coming year would be the Edge of Infinity, and even then, I'm assuming it will be bad, but will give it a chance in the hopes that it's not.
Ahh well.
Gripe, gripe, gripe, badger, badger, badger,...badger, badger, mushroom, mushroom...