Olgar Shiverstone said:As someone whose favorite fantasy is Tolkien's, let me say this:
I'd rather have my testicles ripped out through my nostrils than read the Silmarillion again.
personally, I think overly flowery language and rich and detailed worlds go hand in hand, at least the sort of flowery language that Tolkien uses...if that's a concern for you, perhaps you should give the rest of Tolkien a miss, and instead stick with the works of Robin Hobb, the Sword of Shanarra series, Thieve's World and the likeJustin said:So I've read the LotR trilogy once and had many issues with it, not the least of which were annoying hobbits and the, at times, overly flowerly language. However, I love rich and detailed worlds in fantasy and science fiction,
taliesin15 said:...instead stick with the works of Robin Hobb, the Sword of Shanarra series, Thieve's World and the like
Brown Jenkin said:Like the Bible it also starts with a creation story which while tangentially related it mostly explains a bunch of Middle-earth frameworks and is mostly unrelated to the history of the Simarils (Which is why it is called the Simarilian). I personally found the begining very difficult to get through but the later parts were worth the read.
yeah, nor mine, really--you know, I recently re-read the Fafhrd and Grey Mouser series and found it even better than I remembered it...I'm wondering if I'll have the same experience re-reading The Dying Earth...Justin said:Eh, not my thing, either. Maybe I'll just read Sep's SH again. I think that is what has spoiled all other fantasy for me in the first place.![]()
Here's a first person account of history which is not at all boring or hard to read --Justin said:One other point I can make is that I'd like to get more interested in reading real history, but I've found it difficult (with a few small exceptions) to get into.