Crazy Jerome
First Post
Yep, same here. I think I'd be happy to allow my DMs to excercise discretion over whether a non-orthodox ability score should be used for a saving throw, assuming the DM is less biased and assuming some players who are looking "to win" frankly aren't going to be objective about it. However, this leads to the "Mother May I" debate.
That's true. However, to the extent that we have "Mother May I" in the game (and it is almost inevitable in any broad version of D&D), then I would far prefer it confined to these kind of decisions than elsewhere. "Can I use X instead of Y--and thus get a better modifier while trying Z?" is a lot less of a problem in "Mother May I" than "Can I do Z or not?"
For one thing, I prefer that the player state what the character is doing, then we figure out any questions of mechanics. It makes for smoother play at our table, since a "take it back" option only comes up if the character would have reasonably had certain info, but the player didn't. (Example: "I thought you said that pit was 10 feet across. Now that it is 30 feet, I don't think I'd try it.)