Special Conversion Thread: Finishing off the fey

Actually, the original text says Str is 18(50), which translates to Str 19. I could even see some justification for a slight bump from that, depending on how things look later. In any case, aside from the Str, that looks pretty good.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Actually, the original text says Str is 18(50), which translates to Str 19. I could even see some justification for a slight bump from that, depending on how things look later. In any case, aside from the Str, that looks pretty good.

That depends how you translate it. An AD&D Strength 18/50 is the next Strength category in line after 18 (arguing for a 19), but AD&D ability scores have a much wider plateau in the middle, so most stats don't get bonuses until they reach 15 (instead of 12 like in 3E). Using the damage bonus of +3 for that Strength instead of the raw number you get an equivalent 3E Strength of 16-17, which is what I went for, since it was closest to what you get scaling down an Ogre or Athach's Strength to Medium.

Still, I have no objection to boosting it to 19, we can always say Fachans are at the burly (300-400 pound?) end of Medium.

There are a couple of other stats that look east converts. Speed 9" => 20 feet, Alignment is probably Usually Chaotic Evil and treasure is pretty good (U or Z), so should be at least standard. (It's actually a lot for a single monster, so double standard may be more suited - but that seems rather a lot for such a monster).

So we're now.

Lesser Fachan
Medium Aberration
Hit Dice 5d8+5 (32hp)
Speed 20 ft.
AC 15 (+2 Dex, +3 natural)
Str 19, Dex 15, Con 12, Int 7, Wis 12, Cha 6
Alignment: Usually chaotic evil
Organization: Solitary
Treasure: Standard
 




Aren't we giving them a "Fighter-like" SQ to provide them a fighter's BAB and bonus feats? If so, it should be BAB +5, grapple +9.

I'm wondering whether we should give them a "mighty thew" type ability that gives their single arm a 1.5 times Strength damage-bonus and the ability to wield 2-handed weapons, on the basis that it's as strong as two normal arms? If I remember correctly, Fachans are sometimes portrayed as wielding heavy weapons like great flails and halberds.

Speaking of which, what weapon shall we give them as a default?

Heavy flail would be my preference, although I wouldn't mind greatax. We can give them javelins for a ranged weapon - I doubt they'd be much good at using a bow!
 

I'm not sure they need the fighter BAB, etc., especially if we're modeling them upon the athach, which lacks such an ability.

The "wield oversized weapon" bit seems a good fit, though. So what is a better approach, the more common "wield a weapon sized for a larger creature" ability, allowing it to wield a flail sized for a larger creature in one-hand, or create an ability that allows it to treat two-handed melee weapons as one-handed? I'd assume we would want to exclude double weapons, as that would seem...odd.
 

Suppose we stick to the flail. A Large flail does 2d6 damage. A Medium (2-handed) heavy flail is 1d10/19-20. Damage averages higher for the Large flail but is more concentrated near the average, but the heavy flail will crit twice as often (roughly). Which do we like better?
 

I like the ability for them to wield two-handed weapons in one hand. It seems righter, somehow.

Would they gain the Str x 1.5 when using a two-handed weapon? Even if not, we should address this.
 

Good question. On the one hand (pun intended), they essentially have only one weapon, so if it were a natural attack, they'd get Str and 1/2. They'd also, theoretically, have adapted to relying more on that single arm, so I could see the added Str.

Anyone opposed to Str and 1/2?
 

Remove ads

Top