Sundragon2012
First Post
dcollins said:Another way of looking at it is that the "Sorcerer" was the 3rd Ed. authors' attempt to insert a "spell-points" something into the core rules. You might consider allowing only Sorcerers in your campaign world, no Wizards.
Sorcerers are alright in theory but I don't like the limitations of the class at least insofar as them being the only wizard type. As an option for those who would like to play them however I am all for them iin their own distinct role I far prefer a more flexible wizard as the iconic magic user in my setting. Though I am also tooling clerics in the same way as I couldn'y possibly allow wizards to have the flexibility I am talking about while still tying clerics to the PHB spell progression chart.
Chris