Spelljammer Spelljammer Shows Up In The Wild - Check Out The Tables of Contents

Copies of Spelljammer are starting to show up. Mike Long of Tribality is in receipt of the books and has tweeted some photos!

Copies of Spelljammer are starting to show up. Mike Long of Tribality is in receipt of the books and has tweeted some photos!

2.jpeg

052C4CBE-625B-4E6A-8005-D549BB9BC634.jpeg

31C64296-9C83-406C-B915-BA6C3305CE25.jpeg

1.jpeg
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Parmandur

Book-Friend
So does the tortle and yet it's been specifically called out as not working that way with monks or barbarians. Then there's the specific rules for monks and barbarians. So what happens when two specific rules contradict each other again? Ah, the joys of "natural language."
But that's actually a strength here: the Monk and Barbarian abilities clearly donallow for the math to be changed by this feature.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Parmandur

Book-Friend
Nope. In order to use the two-weapon fighting you need to attack with two LIGHT weapons. Having extra arms doesn't change that. Even the Duel Wielder feat states "you can use two-weapon fighting even when the one-handed melee weapons you are wielding are not light".

So, RAW, you can't do that. What you can do is is fight with two light weapons and a shield, or cast a spell with S and M components with a shield and light weapon equipped (good for EKs).

As per RAW, your secondary hands cannot: help hold a two-handed weapon, hold a shield, load ammo, or perform S and M spell components.
That's still pretty dope, though.
 







Micah Sweet

Level Up & OSR Enthusiast
There is no way WotC will ever allow extra arms to do anything you can't do with two, for the same reason they refuse to print a large race. They consider it unbalanced, and as a result you will continue to see half-measure after half-measure for certain concepts, and it will continue to be unsatisfying.
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top