Zardnaar
Legend
This was exactly the point I was trying to suggest.
DarkCrisis stated that WotC should be able to produce better product than other companies because they have a larger staff and more money. But they have no proof that this indeed is at all true. It might merely be that they feel like this should be true, so I was asking if they actually knew of any other large companies (not even on WotC's scale because no one else is) for which this was true... that having more staff and more cash on hand meant they could produce better adventures than a small independent company could, whose only focus was on that singular adventure.
Paizo would be one that I imagine would be closer to WotC's scale in terms of employee numbers, money to spend, and designers/writers who need to keep several plates spinning at one time (not just work on the singular adventure.) But are their adventure paths as editorially sound and logically progressed moreso that WotC's? I don't know. But that's why I was asking.
It's easy to say "WotC has they money and people, they should be able to make the greatest adventures of all time every time!"... but what proof is there that that's at all true?
Not sure on their recent products but from day 2005ish t 2014ish they were making better APs than WotC. Several CoS equivalents and a mediocre one was more the exception espicially between Age of Worms to Kimgmaker.
That statement is more for levels people played at. And 3.X was rough at higher levels.