Cthulhudrew
First Post
Joe Q's at it again. From the latest session of the OMD interviews at CBR (discussing the Sins Past storyline):
(emphasis mine)
So- it's not okay that Peter and Gwen- two people who are in love with one another and in a healthy, committed relationship to have "unprotected or careless sex out of wedlock", but it is somehow okay to have her cheat on him with her ex-boyfriend's father (also Spider-Man's nemesis and a nutjob?). That's somehow a better compromise.
(Not to mention that even "safe" sex isn't 100% guaranteed to be effective...)
Yeesh.
The interview does make it seem like the changes to the OMD storyline by editorial were done to do damage control (evidently JMS was going to wipe out all Spidey history back to 1971, while this change only mucks with things going back to '87).
Gah! So many people dropping the ball so many ways for so long now on Spidey. It shouldn't irritate me (these are comics, after all, and history can be written and re-written- and probably will- many, many times). But it does.
Joe Quesada said:Joe came to me with a storyline that had Peter meeting these twins... These kids would turn out to be kids that he had with Gwen... In my world, there was no way I could go forward with this story as is. For starters, you’re talking to a guy that feels that a married Peter Parker isn’t the healthiest thing for the franchise since it ages the character... And there were further implications of the story that were out of my comfort zone. First, it was the dealing with the repercussions of Peter and Gwen having unprotected or careless sex out of wedlock.
(emphasis mine)
So- it's not okay that Peter and Gwen- two people who are in love with one another and in a healthy, committed relationship to have "unprotected or careless sex out of wedlock", but it is somehow okay to have her cheat on him with her ex-boyfriend's father (also Spider-Man's nemesis and a nutjob?). That's somehow a better compromise.
(Not to mention that even "safe" sex isn't 100% guaranteed to be effective...)
Yeesh.
The interview does make it seem like the changes to the OMD storyline by editorial were done to do damage control (evidently JMS was going to wipe out all Spidey history back to 1971, while this change only mucks with things going back to '87).
Gah! So many people dropping the ball so many ways for so long now on Spidey. It shouldn't irritate me (these are comics, after all, and history can be written and re-written- and probably will- many, many times). But it does.