Fie. Fie to all of it. This is why I only follow Ultimate Spidey and then rather loosely.
Wulf Ratbane said:For example: He's married.
PRECISELY!Wulf Ratbane said:For example: He's married.
Wulf Ratbane said:For example: He's married.
TheLe said:You know, Joe Quasada is taking quite a lot of heat for this, but I have to believe that Straczynski should take some of the blame too.
He may not be responsible for the "Mephisto" stuff, but he certainly was on-board for ending the marriage.
JMS said:Speak of the devil and he shall appear....
For whatever it's worth, the situation is not as clear cut as one
might hope. The reality of any writer workingfor any company, DC or
Marvel or Image, is that when you're handed a franchise character,
you're basically entrusted with something that the company owns, and
the company has final say in what happens to that character, because
as a writer, you're only there for a certain amount of time and then
the next guy has to come in. Spider-Man belongs to Marvel, not to me,
and at the end of the day, however much I may disagree with things,
and however much I may make it very CLEAR to all parties that I
disagree, I have to honor their position.
In the Gwen storyline, yes, I wanted it to be Peter's kids, Joe over-
rode that, which is his right as EIC. I got the flack for that
decision, but them's the breaks.
In the current storyline, there's a lot that I don't agree with, and I
made this very clear to everybody within shouting distance at Marvel,
especially Joe. I'll be honest: there was a point where I made the
decision, and told Joe, that I was going to take my name off the last
two issues of the OMD arc. Eventually Joe talked me out of that
decision because at the end of the day, I don't want to sabotage Joe
or Marvel, and I have a lot of respect for both of those. As an
executive producer as well as a writer, I've sometimes had to insist
that my writers make changes that they did not want to make, often
loudly so. They were sure I was wrong. Mostly I was right.
Sometimes I was wrong. But whoever sits in the editor's chair, or the
executive producer's chair, wears the pointy hat of authority, and as
Dave Sim once noted, you can't argue with a pointy hat.
So at the end of the day, all one can do is try to do the best one can
with the notes one is given, and try to execute them in a professional
way...because who knows, the other guy may be right. The only thing I
*can* tell you, with absolute certainty, is that what Joe does with
Spidey and all the rest of the Marvel characters, he does out of a
genuine love of the character. He's not looking to sabotage anything,
he's not looking to piss off the fans, he genuinely believes in the
rightness of his views not out of a sense of "I'm the boss" but
because he loves these characters and the Marvel universe.
And right or wrong, you have to respect that.
jms
I disagree with the implication that divorce is intrinsicly irresponsible. The nice thing about it being a story is that the writer can make the decision to divorce as responsible or irresponsible on either person's part as they choose. Especially with spidey's secret identity blown, constructing a situation where amicably ending their relationship is the best course is not difficult.Cthulhudrew said:And, on the divorce angle, I have to agree if only on the basis that Spidey's mantra is "With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility" and him divorcing MJ seems to fly in the face of him being so dedicated and devoted and responsible.
I agree, my parent's divorce was the best thing that they ever did for me and my siblings.Kahuna Burger said:I disagree with the implication that divorce is intrinsicly irresponsible.