Standard 3.5 D&D - Higher Level?

[Arknath]

Ah, good...no rogue as of yet...

My concept??

Simon Ozrick, aka The Serpent.

He's a master escape artist and acrobat.

Basically the concept is Rogue/Thief-Acrobat/Perfect Wight (as far as the ultimate goal for the character). Maybe a few levels of Divine Seeker thrown in there somewhere...

Of course, all those have relavence, just have to give you the full story....what you think?

 

[Sam]

Tailspinner,
Could you put me down as an alternate player? I'd love to get in a game if there's room.

Thanks.

 

[Guest 11456]

. .

 

[Arknath]

Just a question here...possibility that we might move on to the splat books later?

If not, I can come up with a different concept that doesn't involve four other books because of the prestige classes.. LOL

 

[Ashrem Bayle]

Odd choice for a setting. I assume I understood correctly and it is standard D&D with no modern technology?

 

[Ashrem Bayle]

Double treasure? I thought the secondary purpose of the game was to test the standard 3.5 rules at high level.

I'm concerned this much treasure will throw the rules out of wack?

 

[Guest 11456]

. .

 

[Ashrem Bayle]

Laziness on behalf of the DM....

Tails

Hey, if it works, run with it. In fact, thats a good idea for an "on the spot" setting.

I've got my PC mostly done. Should have him up tomorrow or more likely Saturday.

 

[Guest 11456]

. .

 

[reapersaurus]

Just in case there ends up being a spot that opens up, I'd like to play a 3.5E high-level Paladin. But I guess that would require the (almost core) expanded Paladin Mount rules from DotF....