It means that saying that the altered canon in a show, that is supported by the altered canon from which that show is a spin-off, doesn't really do anything more than showing that one show altered canon.
OK, I'm just going to let it lay now. I"m done.Harping on the "spin off" does not seem to be adding any meaning to the point. What's the purpose you have in repeating it?
Or, shall we talk about how the original canon had been set before most of the folks on this discussion board were born, and then left untouched. Is there some reason we are supposed to care?
Second episode is a bit brutal. Its like we are back to kids writing episodes again for adults. Characters making nonsensical out of character decisions. Cadets making fun of officers and acting more like young high school kids than elite cadets on the worlds premier star ship.
Really not knowing anything about the show except the title sounding familiar, does this mean this is a reboot of the Original Series?Personally, I loved it. My spoiler free review is that I feel like I have watched my first real Star Trek show in decades. I like Picard and really enjoy Lower Decks but Strange New Worlds, I thought, really captured the feeling of Trek. It's not nearly as dark as Disco or Picard, visually or thematically. The casting is really good, Anson Mount especially, although Nurse Chapel seems like a totally different person. It does some fiddly things with the canon timeline but that doesn't bug me much. My only real complaint is the size of the ship, Enterprise looks really good but it's way too big
It's a prequel to the original series. It's the adventures of the USS Enterprise under the command of Captain Pike, the commander before Captain Kirk.Really not knowing anything about the show except the title sounding familiar, does this mean this is a reboot of the Original Series?
Both this and the opening episode were really strong and if they keep this quality up, the series will be truly amazing.