buzzard
First Post
Mustrum_Ridcully said:Oh, but just some corrections and additional data from the book:
Torpedos have a range of 3,500,000 km (not 1,500,000 as I wrote earlier), and it can be increased if the antimatter/matter onboard is used for the engines instead of the final explosion. The typical warhead yields 1.5 kg antimatter (the explosion should be comparable to at least some tactical nuclear warheads. Unfortunately, I don`t know how much nuclear material is used with this kind of weapons, and how much mass is actually converted to energy).
The shields seem to be able to hold of 2.688 MW (Megawatt).
One Phaser Emitter (a phaser bank contains of several of them, but I don`t know how or if this adds up) can emit 5.1 MW (maybe someone has some comparitive figures from Babylon 5 or Starwars- Fiction, technical manuals, scenes from the show?)
Mustrum Ridcully
If there is 1.5 kg of antimatter on a photon torpedo, they should be able to varporize pretty much any ship they hit. If we assume full conversion of matter into energy, we're talking 2.7 x10^17 joules of energy. Nukes are only very mildly efficient in terms of the amount of matter transformed into energy (as in fractions of a percent, and not a real big fraction). Of course Star Trek doesn't have them work out to be that powerful, so this doesn't provide us with much of a basis for comparison. If a phaser only emits 5.1 MW of energy, that's pretty ho-hum. I'd say a round from a M1A1 tank delivers on the order of that much energy. We certainly have chemical lasers which are around that right now. The ABL program says it gets multimegawatt beams right launched from a 747. Honestly I do remember from reading a roomate's ST technical book that I was completely underwhelmed by the numbers they claimed. Though the photon torpedo number is pretty crazy. I guess the author didn't bother to apply e= mc^2 and see the result.
buzzard