Paul Farquhar
Legend
Tony Stark does look rather like a villain with good PR to me.
I wouldn't categorizing pouring funding into an ultra-elite institution largely attended by the upper and upper-middle class, and that has itself educated any number of warmongers and people who have gone on to develop weapons of war as exactly repudiating his earlier actions, personally. I think this illustrates a failure of imagination on the part of the writers of Civil War though, primarily.He did commit millions (billions?) to fund an entire class at MIT in Captain America: Civil War.
It's pretty basic writing that if you want to give an impression a character is doing something, you find a way to write it in. Which doesn't seem to have actually happened. The idea that you can just claim a guy is "doing good" without in any way showing it is one of the failings of a lot of recent MCU movies, and illustrates, I think, a bit of a failure to understand their own genre - it's clear they know it doesn't have to be all-action all the time, but what they do spend time on can sometimes be questionable.I am sure he did more, but that does not always make for exciting super-hero movie viewing.
That's a pretty silly question, isn't it? (Because this is the internet, I will clarify that the answer is "yes") It's not even an effective piece of rhetoric, because all you're demonstrating is how forgettable these movies were. As I said re: IM3, it's such a bad movie I've basically blocked it from my memory lol.Did you actually watch any of these movies?
Sure, but the company is still running and still somehow making money, and it's very unclear whether it's just Tony who has stopped making weapons to sell, or whether the company also has, and what counts as "selling".What he's primarily dedicated to is developing means of protecting the world against high-level threats, which he does on his own time and his own dime, not through his company.
Yeah I remember that and I think made reference to it earlier, but it doesn't seem like anyone else has arc reactors except the girl who independently came up with them, which given they seem to be miniature fusion reactors, should be rapidly and completely reconfiguring society. File under "failure to follow up on their own world-building", I guess, which is an increasingly towering/tottering pile with the main MCU.In Avengers he's using Arc reactor technology to make Stark Tower self-sustaining, as a flagship model for introducing the tech commercially.
I mean, they seem to be really taking him in that direction with the more recent news, but that's for another thread I guess!Tony Stark does look rather like a villain with good PR to me.
Pot calling kettle?This is what we call "cope". There's no actual argument or rationale, just a collected anecdotes and vague unsupported, unargued claims, presented as leading to absolute certainty.
Re: the first point, which is at least an interesting anecdote, the question I think is whether the ST was their first real exposure to SW, and whether this is actually their opinion, or your heavily filtered perception of their opinion, and further, whether it will remain their opinion when they're like, 25, and nostalgic for being like being a kid. Because I think there were a lot of kids who liked the PT at like, 8, thought it was uncool at like, 13/14, and then has strong nostalgia for it at like 25+. I think the OT actually had a similar pattern for some people - I know it did for me - Star Wars was actively uncool to like too much when I was say, 14 (in 1992). It wasn't really until I was a bit older that I started to appreciate it again.
That’s a very small sample size these days. Only Lego Star Wars gets much recognition.My experience with the kids who like Star Wars
They don’t like any of the ancient movies (Rise of Skywalker came out 5 years ago, that makes it ancient to the current crop of kids).that they do not like the ST
The kids want Lego. They have no idea which movie it is from, since they haven’t watched any of them all the way though.The kids want PT and OT toys. They do not want ST toys
So the same as the 1990s? Possibly the '00s?Finally, Star Wars is largely non-existent for most of the kids. I ask my son if anyone talks about it around school etc and the answer is no.