Ron
Explorer
Except for Sauron, I haven't found any reason to use epic rules in any character from The Lord of the Rings. As far as I can remember (I've read it about 15 years ago), there are only two instances where high levels should be assumed to justify the feats performed: Gandalf fighting the Balrog and Aragorn tracking the hobbits with amazing precision. The first one can be adjusted as we don't really know how strong the Balrog really was (very impressive, but was it powerful too?), while the second requires a high skill level, but not really epic.
The problem with adapting any literature character to D&D is that the game assumes a very high level of magic. As a matter of fact, D&D is more like a superhero game than a fantasy one at higher levels. As such don't be surprised of the relatively low level I place Gandalf. I would stat him as a Half-celestial CG 7th level Wizard, 3rd level Loremaster with very high abilities stats (at least 18 of Constitution and perhaps more than 18 of Charisma).
Lord of the Rings' characters were done to death in many other threads. There is even a d20 site dedicated to it. What about move to other books or movies?
The problem with adapting any literature character to D&D is that the game assumes a very high level of magic. As a matter of fact, D&D is more like a superhero game than a fantasy one at higher levels. As such don't be surprised of the relatively low level I place Gandalf. I would stat him as a Half-celestial CG 7th level Wizard, 3rd level Loremaster with very high abilities stats (at least 18 of Constitution and perhaps more than 18 of Charisma).
Lord of the Rings' characters were done to death in many other threads. There is even a d20 site dedicated to it. What about move to other books or movies?