Streaming services, which do you have or are you getting rid of?

Well, Disney is a publicly-traded company, so we know that Disney's stocks fell by 1.9% since they made the decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel. And we also know that 1.9% of Disney stock is worth $3.87 billion. We don't know if the Disney boycott was the reason their stocks fell...but evidently Disney does believe it, because they reversed their decision after just one week.
Yeah, my guess is that someone was doing back of the envelope math with stock prices, D+ subscriptions and maybe ad buys, to the extent that data could be sort of known this quickly. (Stock prices are the easiest to get, of course, because they're out there in the public.)
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Well, Disney is a publicly-traded company, so we know that Disney's stocks fell by 1.9% since they made the decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel. And we also know that 1.9% of Disney stock is worth $3.87 billion. We don't know if the Disney boycott was the reason their stocks fell...but evidently Disney does believe it, because they reversed their decision after just one week.

If their change of direction is indeed because of the boycott, it would make this the first ever successful boycott against The Mouse.
However, they were already talking about reversals before the drop. I think it more likely that they suspended Kimmel to take a look at their legal exposure, found that there was none, and then reversed course.
 


Currently:
Netflix - best of the bad. And so long as Brigderton is there, it's on. Plus, it's discounted trough my ISP
Disney+ - cartoons for kids
YT Premium - i tend to watch yt on tv and adds are getting ridicoulous latley (16-20 second unskippable adds, sometimes 2 in a row), plus YT Music premium is included, so no need for spotify/deezer

That's pretty much it.
 

I just got an email saying that my Hulu + package is increasing in price. I thought Disney was ending Hulu as a separate service, so why would I have to pay more? I might cancel after all.
 




I am not so sure.

It looks to me more like the original decision to preempt Kimmel was a snap judgement. This shift to put him back on then took days.
And I think that snap judgement was made in response to the affiliates' actions rather than anything else.
 

Remove ads

Top